> nslookup deprecated? Rats. Good riddence. > Yes, it's useful. I like nslookup. (Plus I feel that dig is pretty verbose, > but maybe there's a flag to control that that I've been too lazy to look > for.) I guess it depends on application. If you need to know the nuts and bolts of a query, use dig. If you only need a quick resolution use host. The problem (for me anyways) was that what you asked for from nslookup need not be what it returned. You would ask it to query one nameserver and it would for no apparent reason ignore your request and use nameservers in your resolve file.
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Robin Szemeti
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Redvers Davies
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... Steve Keay
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-W... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-W... Robin Szemeti
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless... Robin Szemeti
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Steve Keay
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Robin Szemeti