> That's what I'm proposing. A 'professional' recertification policy. In a > way, it is easier this way for the LPI professional than the time and worry > of studying for more exams. It would take an hour or two to assemble the > information and, voila, you are recerted for another X years. > > I know that I'm busy enough and would prefer a non-exam based way to maintain > my credentials... > > Especially at the LPIC-3 level. By that time, someone has shown the > commitment to their professional designation by taking at least 5 exams.
Oh yes, I really like that idea. Let's switch the discussion to some non-exam based ways to measure if someone is still to be considered professional enough to maintain the LPI certificate. Matt, do you have any idea on what kind of information we would be looking for? Regards, Sander _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
