It was Wed Nov 07 at 05:07PM when Crawford Rainwater wrote: > Actually for clarification, I am saying "No" to having anything beyond > rpm, dpkg, and/or "make" (e.g., portage/emerge situation) on the > LPIC-1 for package management related questions. > > I am saying "Yes" (BUT, do see above paragraph and comment) to if > "apt" then include "yum" scenario, but I stand by my above noted > comment still (yes, it is meant to be written twice for the emphasis > of my position).
if we were to split the package management layers, among two exams, wouldn't it be more logical to have the higher level (emerge, apt*, yum) in LPIC-1 and the lower level (ebuild, dpkg, rpm) in LPIC-2, instead of the other way around? -- regards, Bart Van Loon "I suppose the secret to happiness is learning to appreciate the moment." -Calvin _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
