Crawford Rainwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually for clarification, I am saying "No" to having anything > beyond rpm, dpkg, and/or "make" (e.g., portage/emerge situation) > on the LPIC-1 for package management related questions.
And I can very much agree with that too. In all honesty, APT and YUM -- in basic usage -- are easy and can be learned in passing. DPKG and RPM are things that an experienced, even if only junior, sysadmin will have run into more than once. So it's a better test of knowledge, understanding and, possibly, even application. Don't know where Ricey-boy got the idea that I was advocating LPIC-2 for YUM. ;) > I am saying "Yes" (BUT, do see above paragraph and comment) to if > "apt" then include "yum" scenario, Hence why I stated ... "... we should have YUM if we're testing APT. Right now it seems we are testing APT and RPM ..." (note the "if") -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
