Dear Christian,
   Point taken - though others also expressed concern that personal emails
   became public! Bit I'll aim to send any further communications on this
   direct matter only to Monica.
   regards,
   Martyn
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: Christian Aretz <[email protected]>
   To: Martyn Hodgson <[email protected]>
   Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; LutList
   <[email protected]>
   Sent: Saturday, 6 August 2016, 9:10
   Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Protocol was Re: Privacy
   Please excuse my lack of interest in netiquette-discussions, but
   wouldn't it be a good moment to stop this publicly conducted (and
   meanwhile extremely annoying!) discussion now (!) and get back to
   normal life and lute related topics?
   Thanks,
   Christian
   > Am 06.08.2016 um 09:53 schrieb Martyn Hodgson
   <[1][email protected]>:
   >
   >  Dear Monica,
   >  Well, kettle and pot comes to mind!  But seriously, I'm certainly
   happy
   >  to admit that I was wrong in this case by expecting a personal email
   to
   >  remain private. This is the whole point of my last message which,
   I'm
   >  very sorry to say, you have avoided addressing. Whether I know Anton
   >  Hoger (I don't) and his work (only what's on ISMLP) is wholly
   >  immaterial to this matter.
   >  And finally, how is it wrong to suggest to someone that there may be
   >  other ways to achieve what they may be wishing to do? And how is it
   >  wrong to do this privately and so avoiding (or trying to) any
   personal
   >  embarrassment and ridiculous slanging matches?
   >  regards,
   >  Martyn
   >    __________________________________________________________________
   >
   >  From: "[2][email protected]" <[3][email protected]>
   >  To: LutList <[4][email protected]>
   >  Cc: Martyn Hodgson <[5][email protected]>
   >  Sent: Friday, 5 August 2016, 17:41
   >  Subject: Fw: Protocol was Re: [LUTE] Privacy
   >  Clearly this is going to run and run as Martyn can never admit that
   he
   >  might be in the wrong.
   >  As far as I am aware Martyn does not know Anton personally, knows
   >  nothing about him or his work, doesn't understand why he is doing it
   or
   >  why he sends messages to the list to draw attention to it.
   >  I think it was officious and patronising of Martyn to contact Anton
   off
   >  the list and say to him - if this is what he did say
   >  "Have you ever considered learning to play from figured bass? This
   >  would save
   >  you much mundane work making these unnecessary
   >  transcriptions/arrangements".
   >  Anton is a professional player and doesn't need any advice from
   Martyn.
   >  Other people certainly don't think that Anton's transcriptions are
   >  unnecessry.
   >  If what you want to say is not suitable to be said in public perhaps
   >  you should ask yourself what right you have to contact someone whom
   you
   >  have never met and say it to them in private.
   >  That seems like harassment to me.
   >  As ever
   >  Monica
   >  ----Original Message----
   >  From: [1][6][email protected]
   >  Date: 05/08/2016 12:38
   >  To: "[2][7][email protected]"<[3][8][email protected]>,
   >  "[4][9][email protected].
   >  uk"<[5][10][email protected]>
   >  Subj: Fw: Protocol was Re: [LUTE] Privacy
   >  Dear Monica,
   >  Well, to be clear, I didn't wish to say anything on the open list
   >  since, knowing how some may take any suggestion, even if meant
   >  helpfully (as explained in my longer subsequent posting), as a
   slight,
   >  a private rather than public message was thought more appropriate in
   >  this case. Just because someone's name is on this list doesn't
   prohibit
   >  one from conducting private communications if considered more
   >  appropriate (and tactful..........).
   >  In general I think the usual protocol is probably the wisest to
   follow:
   >  a personal message is just that. Ralf Mattes well sets this out in
   his
   >  message yesterday.
   >  And yes, if we think it more appropriate to discuss things
   personally
   >  with another individual list member (who we may already know anyway)
   >  then I can see no problem with that. Indeed, some of the more useful
   >  and helpful messages I receive from time to time are by from
   individual
   >  list members not copied to the entire list. Horses for courses I
   >  think..........
   >  regards,
   >  Martyn.
   >  ________________________________
   >  From: "[6][11][email protected]" <[7][12][email protected]>
   >  To: LutList <[8][13][email protected]>
   >  Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2016, 15:31
   >  Subject: [LUTE] Privacy
   >  I think that what I was trying to say has been misconstrued - as is
   >  often the case with these arguments.
   >  If you are on Facebook - or Earlyguitar.ning people can only contact
   >  you directly if you accept them as friends.
   >  This list is different.  Anyone can join, there is no moderator,
   nobody
   >  decides who may join.  That means that everyone on the list has
   access
   >  to everyone else's e-mails. This facility should not be abused.
   >  As I understand it Martyn contacted Anton after he had posted
   details
   >  of his latest intabulations on this list. If Martyn has anything
   >  helpful to say that might help Anton  to make his work even more
   useful
   >  than it is already - and a lot of people do find it very useful and
   are
   >  grateful to him for posting the details - then why not say it here.
   We
   >  have discussed this before.
   >  Does being on this list mean that anyone is entitled to engage in a
   >  one-
   >  to-one correspondence with you?
   >  Better leave it at that as this will probably be misconstrued too.
   >  Monica
   >  To get on or off this list see list information at
   >  [9][14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >
   >  --
   >
   > References
   >
   >  1. mailto:[15][email protected]
   >  2. mailto:[16][email protected]
   >  3. mailto:[17][email protected]
   >  4. mailto:[18][email protected].
   >  5. mailto:[19][email protected]
   >  6. mailto:[20][email protected]
   >  7. mailto:[21][email protected]
   >  8. mailto:[22][email protected]
   >  9. [23]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. mailto:[email protected]
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. mailto:[email protected]
   7. mailto:[email protected]
   8. mailto:[email protected]
   9. mailto:[email protected].
  10. mailto:[email protected]
  11. mailto:[email protected]
  12. mailto:[email protected]
  13. mailto:[email protected]
  14. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  15. mailto:[email protected]
  16. mailto:[email protected]
  17. mailto:[email protected]
  18. mailto:[email protected].
  19. mailto:[email protected]
  20. mailto:[email protected]
  21. mailto:[email protected]
  22. mailto:[email protected]
  23. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to