Christian et al.
   I block people that spam, bore or insult. The way the lutelist works
   means that such a filter is not perfect, but it helps a little.
   David Out

   *******************************
   David van Ooijen
   [1][email protected]
   [2]www.davidvanooijen.nl
   *******************************
   On 6 August 2016 at 10:10, Christian Aretz
   <[3][email protected]> wrote:

     Please excuse my lack of interest in netiquette-discussions, but
     wouldn't it be a good moment to stop this publicly conducted (and
     meanwhile extremely annoying!) discussion now (!) and get back to
     normal life and lute related topics?
     Thanks,
     Christian
     > Am 06.08.2016 um 09:53 schrieb Martyn Hodgson
     <[4][email protected]>:
     >
     >    Dear Monica,
     >    Well, kettle and pot comes to mind!   But seriously, I'm
     certainly happy
     >    to admit that I was wrong in this case by expecting a personal
     email to
     >    remain private. This is the whole point of my last message
     which, I'm
     >    very sorry to say, you have avoided addressing. Whether I know
     Anton
     >    Hoger (I don't) and his work (only what's on ISMLP) is wholly
     >    immaterial to this matter.
     >    And finally, how is it wrong to suggest to someone that there
     may be
     >    other ways to achieve what they may be wishing to do? And how
     is it
     >    wrong to do this privately and so avoiding (or trying to) any
     personal
     >    embarrassment and ridiculous slanging matches?
     >    regards,
     >    Martyn
     >      ____________________________________________________________
     ______
     >
     >    From: "[5][email protected]" <[6][email protected]>
     >    To: LutList <[7][email protected]>
     >    Cc: Martyn Hodgson <[8][email protected]>
     >    Sent: Friday, 5 August 2016, 17:41
     >    Subject: Fw: Protocol was Re: [LUTE] Privacy
     >    Clearly this is going to run and run as Martyn can never admit
     that he
     >    might be in the wrong.
     >    As far as I am aware Martyn does not know Anton personally,
     knows
     >    nothing about him or his work, doesn't understand why he is
     doing it or
     >    why he sends messages to the list to draw attention to it.
     >    I think it was officious and patronising of Martyn to contact
     Anton off
     >    the list and say to him - if this is what he did say
     >    "Have you ever considered learning to play from figured bass?
     This
     >    would save
     >    you much mundane work making these unnecessary
     >    transcriptions/arrangements".
     >    Anton is a professional player and doesn't need any advice from
     Martyn.
     >    Other people certainly don't think that Anton's transcriptions
     are
     >    unnecessry.
     >    If what you want to say is not suitable to be said in public
     perhaps
     >    you should ask yourself what right you have to contact someone
     whom you
     >    have never met and say it to them in private.
     >    That seems like harassment to me.
     >    As ever
     >    Monica
     >    ----Original Message----
     >    From: [1][9][email protected]
     >    Date: 05/08/2016 12:38
     >    To: "[2][10][email protected]"<[3][11]
     [email protected]>,
     >    "[4][12][email protected].
     >    uk"<[5][13][email protected]>
     >    Subj: Fw: Protocol was Re: [LUTE] Privacy
     >    Dear Monica,
     >    Well, to be clear, I didn't wish to say anything on the open
     list
     >    since, knowing how some may take any suggestion, even if meant
     >    helpfully (as explained in my longer subsequent posting), as a
     slight,
     >    a private rather than public message was thought more
     appropriate in
     >    this case. Just because someone's name is on this list doesn't
     prohibit
     >    one from conducting private communications if considered more
     >    appropriate (and tactful..........).
     >    In general I think the usual protocol is probably the wisest to
     follow:
     >    a personal message is just that. Ralf Mattes well sets this out
     in his
     >    message yesterday.
     >    And yes, if we think it more appropriate to discuss things
     personally
     >    with another individual list member (who we may already know
     anyway)
     >    then I can see no problem with that. Indeed, some of the more
     useful
     >    and helpful messages I receive from time to time are by from
     individual
     >    list members not copied to the entire list. Horses for courses
     I
     >    think..........
     >    regards,
     >    Martyn.
     >    ________________________________
     >    From: "[6][14][email protected]"
     <[7][15][email protected]>
     >    To: LutList <[8][16][email protected]>
     >    Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2016, 15:31
     >    Subject: [LUTE] Privacy
     >    I think that what I was trying to say has been misconstrued -
     as is
     >    often the case with these arguments.
     >    If you are on Facebook - or Earlyguitar.ning people can only
     contact
     >    you directly if you accept them as friends.
     >    This list is different.   Anyone can join, there is no
     moderator, nobody
     >    decides who may join.   That means that everyone on the list
     has access
     >    to everyone else's e-mails. This facility should not be abused.
     >    As I understand it Martyn contacted Anton after he had posted
     details
     >    of his latest intabulations on this list. If Martyn has
     anything
     >    helpful to say that might help Anton   to make his work even
     more useful
     >    than it is already - and a lot of people do find it very useful
     and are
     >    grateful to him for posting the details - then why not say it
     here. We
     >    have discussed this before.
     >    Does being on this list mean that anyone is entitled to engage
     in a
     >    one-
     >    to-one correspondence with you?
     >    Better leave it at that as this will probably be misconstrued
     too.
     >    Monica
     >    To get on or off this list see list information at
     >    [9][17]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     >
     >    --
     >
     > References
     >
     >    1. mailto:[18][email protected]
     >    2. mailto:[19][email protected]
     >    3. mailto:[20][email protected]
     >    4. mailto:[21][email protected].
     >    5. mailto:[22][email protected]
     >    6. mailto:[23][email protected]
     >    7. mailto:[24][email protected]
     >    8. mailto:[25][email protected]
     >    9. [26]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     >

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. mailto:[email protected]
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. mailto:[email protected]
   7. mailto:[email protected]
   8. mailto:[email protected]
   9. mailto:[email protected]
  10. mailto:[email protected]
  11. mailto:[email protected]
  12. mailto:[email protected]
  13. mailto:[email protected]
  14. mailto:[email protected]
  15. mailto:[email protected]
  16. mailto:[email protected]
  17. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  18. mailto:[email protected]
  19. mailto:[email protected]
  20. mailto:[email protected]
  21. mailto:[email protected]
  22. mailto:[email protected]
  23. mailto:[email protected]
  24. mailto:[email protected]
  25. mailto:[email protected]
  26. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to