Oops, now I'm the bore/spammer. ;-)

   *******************************
   David van Ooijen
   [1][email protected]
   [2]www.davidvanooijen.nl
   *******************************
   On 6 August 2016 at 11:52, David van Ooijen
   <[3][email protected]> wrote:

        Christian et al.
        I block people that spam, bore or insult. The way the lutelist
     works
        means that such a filter is not perfect, but it helps a little.
        David Out
        *******************************
        David van Ooijen
        [1][4][email protected]
        [2][5]www.davidvanooijen.nl
        *******************************
        On 6 August 2016 at 10:10, Christian Aretz
        <[3][6][email protected]> wrote:
          Please excuse my lack of interest in netiquette-discussions,
     but
          wouldn't it be a good moment to stop this publicly conducted
     (and
          meanwhile extremely annoying!) discussion now (!) and get back
     to
          normal life and lute related topics?
          Thanks,
          Christian
          > Am 06.08.2016 um 09:53 schrieb Martyn Hodgson
          <[4][7][email protected]>:
          >
          >     Dear Monica,
          >     Well, kettle and pot comes to mind!    But seriously, I'm
          certainly happy
          >     to admit that I was wrong in this case by expecting a
     personal
          email to
          >     remain private. This is the whole point of my last
     message
          which, I'm
          >     very sorry to say, you have avoided addressing. Whether I
     know
          Anton
          >     Hoger (I don't) and his work (only what's on ISMLP) is
     wholly
          >     immaterial to this matter.
          >     And finally, how is it wrong to suggest to someone that
     there
          may be
          >     other ways to achieve what they may be wishing to do? And
     how
          is it
          >     wrong to do this privately and so avoiding (or trying to)
     any
          personal
          >     embarrassment and ridiculous slanging matches?
          >     regards,
          >     Martyn
          >       ______________________________
     ______________________________
          ______
          >
          >     From: "[5][8][email protected]"
     <[6][9][email protected]>
          >     To: LutList <[7][10][email protected]>
          >     Cc: Martyn Hodgson <[8][11][email protected]>
          >     Sent: Friday, 5 August 2016, 17:41
          >     Subject: Fw: Protocol was Re: [LUTE] Privacy
          >     Clearly this is going to run and run as Martyn can never
     admit
          that he
          >     might be in the wrong.
          >     As far as I am aware Martyn does not know Anton
     personally,
          knows
          >     nothing about him or his work, doesn't understand why he
     is
          doing it or
          >     why he sends messages to the list to draw attention to
     it.
          >     I think it was officious and patronising of Martyn to
     contact
          Anton off
          >     the list and say to him - if this is what he did say
          >     "Have you ever considered learning to play from figured
     bass?
          This
          >     would save
          >     you much mundane work making these unnecessary
          >     transcriptions/arrangements".
          >     Anton is a professional player and doesn't need any
     advice from
          Martyn.
          >     Other people certainly don't think that Anton's
     transcriptions
          are
          >     unnecessry.
          >     If what you want to say is not suitable to be said in
     public
          perhaps
          >     you should ask yourself what right you have to contact
     someone
          whom you
          >     have never met and say it to them in private.
          >     That seems like harassment to me.
          >     As ever
          >     Monica
          >     ----Original Message----
          >     From: [1][9][12][email protected]
          >     Date: 05/08/2016 12:38
          >     To: "[2][10][13][email protected]"<[3][11]
          [14][email protected]>,
          >     "[4][12][15][email protected].
          >     uk"<[5][13][16][email protected]>
          >     Subj: Fw: Protocol was Re: [LUTE] Privacy
          >     Dear Monica,
          >     Well, to be clear, I didn't wish to say anything on the
     open
          list
          >     since, knowing how some may take any suggestion, even if
     meant
          >     helpfully (as explained in my longer subsequent posting),
     as a
          slight,
          >     a private rather than public message was thought more
          appropriate in
          >     this case. Just because someone's name is on this list
     doesn't
          prohibit
          >     one from conducting private communications if considered
     more
          >     appropriate (and tactful..........).
          >     In general I think the usual protocol is probably the
     wisest to
          follow:
          >     a personal message is just that. Ralf Mattes well sets
     this out
          in his
          >     message yesterday.
          >     And yes, if we think it more appropriate to discuss
     things
          personally
          >     with another individual list member (who we may already
     know
          anyway)
          >     then I can see no problem with that. Indeed, some of the
     more
          useful
          >     and helpful messages I receive from time to time are by
     from
          individual
          >     list members not copied to the entire list. Horses for
     courses
          I
          >     think..........
          >     regards,
          >     Martyn.
          >     ________________________________
          >     From: "[6][14][17][email protected]"
          <[7][15][18][email protected]>
          >     To: LutList <[8][16][19][email protected]>
          >     Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2016, 15:31
          >     Subject: [LUTE] Privacy
          >     I think that what I was trying to say has been
     misconstrued -
          as is
          >     often the case with these arguments.
          >     If you are on Facebook - or Earlyguitar.ning people can
     only
          contact
          >     you directly if you accept them as friends.
          >     This list is different.    Anyone can join, there is no
          moderator, nobody
          >     decides who may join.    That means that everyone on the
     list
          has access
          >     to everyone else's e-mails. This facility should not be
     abused.
          >     As I understand it Martyn contacted Anton after he had
     posted
          details
          >     of his latest intabulations on this list. If Martyn has
          anything
          >     helpful to say that might help Anton    to make his work
     even
          more useful
          >     than it is already - and a lot of people do find it very
     useful
          and are
          >     grateful to him for posting the details - then why not
     say it
          here. We
          >     have discussed this before.
          >     Does being on this list mean that anyone is entitled to
     engage
          in a
          >     one-
          >     to-one correspondence with you?
          >     Better leave it at that as this will probably be
     misconstrued
          too.
          >     Monica
          >     To get on or off this list see list information at
          >     [9][17][20]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/
     index.html
          >
          >     --
          >
          > References
          >
          >     1. mailto:[18][21][email protected]
          >     2. mailto:[19][22][email protected]
          >     3. mailto:[20][23][email protected]
          >     4. mailto:[21][24][email protected].
          >     5. mailto:[22][25][email protected]
          >     6. mailto:[23][26][email protected]
          >     7. mailto:[24][27][email protected]
          >     8. mailto:[25][28][email protected]
          >     9. [26][29]http://www.cs.dartmouth.
     edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
          >
        --
     References
        1. mailto:[30][email protected]
        2. [31]http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
        3. mailto:[32][email protected]
        4. mailto:[33][email protected]
        5. mailto:[34][email protected]
        6. mailto:[35][email protected]
        7. mailto:[36][email protected]
        8. mailto:[37][email protected]
        9. mailto:[38][email protected]
       10. mailto:[39][email protected]
       11. mailto:[40][email protected]
       12. mailto:[41][email protected]
       13. mailto:[42][email protected]
       14. mailto:[43][email protected]
       15. mailto:[44][email protected]
       16. mailto:[45][email protected]
       17. [46]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       18. mailto:[47][email protected]
       19. mailto:[48][email protected]
       20. mailto:[49][email protected]
       21. mailto:[50][email protected]
       22. mailto:[51][email protected]
       23. mailto:[52][email protected]
       24. mailto:[53][email protected]
       25. mailto:[54][email protected]
       26. [55]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. mailto:[email protected]
   5. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
   6. mailto:[email protected]
   7. mailto:[email protected]
   8. mailto:[email protected]
   9. mailto:[email protected]
  10. mailto:[email protected]
  11. mailto:[email protected]
  12. mailto:[email protected]
  13. mailto:[email protected]
  14. mailto:[email protected]
  15. mailto:[email protected]
  16. mailto:[email protected]
  17. mailto:[email protected]
  18. mailto:[email protected]
  19. mailto:[email protected]
  20. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  21. mailto:[email protected]
  22. mailto:[email protected]
  23. mailto:[email protected]
  24. mailto:[email protected]
  25. mailto:[email protected]
  26. mailto:[email protected]
  27. mailto:[email protected]
  28. mailto:[email protected]
  29. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  30. mailto:[email protected]
  31. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
  32. mailto:[email protected]
  33. mailto:[email protected]
  34. mailto:[email protected]
  35. mailto:[email protected]
  36. mailto:[email protected]
  37. mailto:[email protected]
  38. mailto:[email protected]
  39. mailto:[email protected]
  40. mailto:[email protected]
  41. mailto:[email protected]
  42. mailto:[email protected]
  43. mailto:[email protected]
  44. mailto:[email protected]
  45. mailto:[email protected]
  46. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  47. mailto:[email protected]
  48. mailto:[email protected]
  49. mailto:[email protected]
  50. mailto:[email protected]
  51. mailto:[email protected]
  52. mailto:[email protected]
  53. mailto:[email protected]
  54. mailto:[email protected]
  55. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to