If Taylor Swift ever picks up a lute - I'd be sorely tempted to look for another
instrument for myself.
Lute has been (at least to some of us) an antidote for kitsch that permeates the
commercial mass culture.
Such reactions are not limited to lutes. There has a huge backlash against mass production,
and a resurgence of the handmade in all other art fields.
RT


On 12/25/2017 8:12 AM, Ido Shdaimah wrote:
    Interesting mail, Tristan.
    While many of us (including me) would like to see the lute flourish in
    the world of modern classical music, maybe its best chance is actually
    in more popular types of music.
    I think a few factors might block that though:
    1. Obscurity: Sterling Price gave an anecdote in one of his videos (If
    I recall correctly), where he told someone he plays the lute, and that
    fellow thought he was referring to the flute. Yes, many people don't
    know what is a lute or don't know that it's still played today.
    2. Price: Like you mentioned, not everyone can even afford (or want to
    buy) Luth Dore lutes, but most would stay clear of overpriced Pakistani
    lutes. Something like Yamaha guitars; cheap but playable enough, would
    do wonders to the lute world.
    3. Available repertoire, which lacks two things: popularity of the old
    music and modern popular music. If Taylor Swift (for example) suddenly
    started playing the lute on stage and had songs for it, we would
    definitely see a large influx of new players. Having intabulations of
    popular music to the lute is not enough, it's also important to bring
    the instrument out of obscurity.
    The lute does have a lot of advantages such as the easy systems of
    French and Italian tablature. The availability of a lot of cool (but
    obscure) repertoire. Its portability and its sweet, delicate and warm
    tone more suitable to the human voice than the guitar (in my opinion).
    I'm not sure if all these are enough to tackle the above problems.
    On Dec 23, 2017 02:08, "Tristan von Neumann"
    <[1]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de> wrote:

      This is probably too pessimistic, for reasons I will now try to
      explain I hope in a deeper look at today's music.
      Of course this is just an educated guess, not a prophecy, and more
      of an encouragement. The Lutists ultimately set the course. (oh no -
      back in the pundaemonium...)
      1. The audience for Early Music (even really early music) is bigger
      than the "New Music" ("Neue Musik").
      Whenever a composer is successfully appealing to a general audience,
      you can always assume it is because of a great sense of traditional
      tonality or modality. Philip Glass and John Adams seem widely
      popular in the US even among the non-classical audiences.
      In Europe, there's Arvo Pärt who left the path of atonality and
      serialism, and it seems the Spectralists of France are well based in
      the tradition of Debussy, Ravel and Messiaen (take Dalbavie for
      example).
      Therefore, an obscure instrument is just introduced into an even
      more obscure scene. (viewed from the mass standpoint)
      Such musical approach was at least until around 2000 also part of
      the film score scene. Jerry Goldsmith, John Williams and others have
      treated film scores as New Music. But here is the strong move:
      By forcing it onto millions of movie buffs, for the duration of
      popularity of this movie, there is a considerable amount of time for
      a good tune, a good theme, to leak out as a "cover version",
      establishing a basis even for canonification. Some are more
      successful than others.
      Compared to a First Performance of some fancy delicate atonal piece
      of chamber music in front of 100 people of whom 80 don't really get
      what is happening on the stage, it looks pretty obvious to me that
      though we all wish they were more popular, our little bubbles of
      special music do not represent the reality of most people.
      Star Wars, Star Trek, Lord of the Rings, indeed mostly fantastic
      movies contain a great deal of popular classical music today, which
      is probably the closest many people get to hearing a real orchestra.
      But this is actually a pretty good basis and should not be
      ridiculed.
      2. If you behold the big picture, the mass audience is completely
      going into a different direction. If you pick the most complex or
      well set music of "non-classical new music", there is:
      a) Metal, Progressive Rock, Post Rock - highly complex and often
      deliberately referring to Renaissance and Medieval music, embracing
      concepts of modes and even iso-rhythmia and counterpoint, though
      often very fast paced.
      b) IDM ("Intelligent Dance Music") - more closely related to "New
      Music", but occupying spaces classical performers almost never
      reach.
      Exceptions (to my knowledge of course) maybe "Alarm will Sound", a
      chamber orchestra from New York, that plays complex Electronic Music
      arrangements.
       "Ensemble Resonanz" in Hamburg, who are for years getting their
      foot into the club scene, attract new audiences for "New Music",
      while also playing Early Music (and everything in between). They are
      not afraid to play Perotin and Philip Glass in the same concert, or
      have Finnish electronic musician Jimi Tenor write music for them.
      Other ensembles in other countries and cities might try similar
      things, though when I search on youtube, such fruitful crossovers
      seem rare.
      c) Computer and Video game music.
      The Japanese have now for years a very healthy relationship to music
      composed for video games. It is completely normal to hear the Tokyo
      Phil play the Super Mario Bros. theme, or a Legend of Zelda Medley.
      These compositions are often surprisingly good and well arranged,
      because - in reverse - classically trained composers have no fear
      writing for a video game.
      If you look on youtube, there are literally thousands of videos of
      teenagers playing video game music on their piano, guitar, ukulele,
      etc., some even forming little ensembles, making even their own
      arrangements.
      3. Sounds familiar? Well, the Lute repertoire fits exactly these
      purposes - you want crazy Ricercars for the outgoing
      experimentalists, some popular songs, some dance music, you copy
      your favourite tunes, make mixtapes (Lute books), copy music from
      friends etc.
      Some hits appear everywhere, some gems (nearly) get lost.
       The lute is an instrument that appeals to Metal/Rock people,
      because it allows great versatile styles more intense, somehow
      brighter, louder and more subtle than a modern guitar, and it's
      Medievalish cool.
      A cittern might even be considered the "electric guitar" of its
      time.
      I don't know what happend to the group "Pantagruel", but the leader
      of the band had deeper experiences with rock music, his Early music
      interpretations felt very engaging.
      Or maybe someone remembers the late Owain Phyfe.
      This is the attitude at least I am looking for.
      The lute is great to sing to, and it doesn't matter if it's Dowland
      or Bob Dylan, it will still sound great. Lute is for songs.
      Today's dance music might be difficult to recreate on a lute, but
      with some percussion, this could be achieved.
      And last but not least: there are tons of Fantasy RPG's with catchy
      kind of medieval/renaissance-ish tunes that people would love to
      play on the lute.
      And the movie scores again.
      4. For some time now, German music shoppe giant "Thomann" has taken
      Lute instruments into their portfolio. These are specially
      commissioned lines of instruments - I don't know if one of you had
      tried one of those Lutes, Theorbos or Renaissance/Baroque guitars.
      I'd be interested to hear about experiences with these instruments,
      as it seemed to me that these are not the infamous Pakistani
      instruments.
      Well - basically you can now get a Lute for $500 if you don't mind
      the clean cut flat rose etc., similar to Le Luth Doré, which seems
      to make similar restrictions to achieve a lower price.
      If Lutists and Luthiers overcome the resentment of these production
      methods and instead encouraging lowering the bar for the huge number
      of amateur guitarists, who might not be able to afford a real hand
      crafted master lute. These people might even try the original stuff,
      as they have not only the actual instrument, but also a great
      popular tab system (French) and lots of great original pieces at
      hand in the internets.
      5. Conclusion:
      I see a brighter future for the lute. Neither in the Early Music
      scene, nor in the New Music scene, but in popular music through the
      playing of popular music on the Lute.
      Some steps are made, but it's on you to widen your repertoire a bit.
      What you can do: Play Metallica or Katie Perry, or Depeche Mode on
      the lute, and if your intabulations are any good, other people will
      want to play them. You will at least encourage them to try it on
      their guitar, where they will come to the conclusion that the lute
      might just be the cooler instrument after all. Of course there were
      no copyright issues back then...
      This would have to be sorted out.
      There should be more themed intabulation contests, or even
      "intabulation and fantasy" Paladin style.
      Legend of Zelda, Lord of the Rings, Game of Thrones, it's all there.
      Don't let guitarists be the only ones :)
      Here's some inspiration:
      [2]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtDX-KsBDQA
      [3]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3h9jGSBVJo
      [4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG3wpCeYogQ
      [5]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnINBKOnDZU
      [6]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkRd_OmsJKk
      Props to those people, maybe some of them are here on the list.

    Am 22.12.2017 um 20:13 schrieb Ron Andrico:

        Both Chris and Gilbert have made excellent points: New music for
    the
        lute is not widely accepted because the lute is considered to be a
        representative emblem of early music, and new music for the lute is
    not
        taught in conservatories because lute teachers holding conservatory
        posts must adhere to the received and accepted idea of what defines
        early music.
        I have expended a great deal of time and energy researching and
        digesting information describing the arc of the early music revival
        and, in my view, the lute simply will not survive the apparent
    downward
        spiral and eventual demise of the early music revival - unless the
        instrument somehow transcends the bounds of   its associations with
        early music.   New music for the lute may help the instrument
    survive,
        but it will not happen without certain compromises.
        I'll have much more to say on the topic in the coming year.   Watch
    this
        space.
        RA

        --
    To get on or off this list see list information at

      [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

    --

References

    1. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
    2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtDX-KsBDQA
    3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3h9jGSBVJo
    4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG3wpCeYogQ
    5. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnINBKOnDZU
    6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkRd_OmsJKk
    7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to