2014-04-11 10:02 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > > I found two French texts on the subject: > > > > > http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/lfr_0023-8368_2000_num_126_1_989?_Prescripts_Search_tabs1=standard&; > > http://www.filecluster.fr/logiciel/OTableau-151858.html > > > > Maybe it is such a specialized field that the suffix (OT) is clear to > > everyone ? Or maybe you can translate it as "tableau optimalité > > théorie". > > > > Vincent > > Well, I mean: > > "Tableau" -> "Tableau" > "List of Tableaux" -> "Liste des tableaux optimalité théorie" >
We are talking about the PDF output, right? Then I would not add such a specification. OT is a rather specialized approach in linguistics. If people use OT tableaux, then they'll probably use it in papers targeted to an insider audience. It would sound rather ridiculous if you would want to explain them what kind of tableaux these are. I think a linguist who is in OT would just expect "Tableaux" and "Liste des tableaux". No more, no less. Jürgen > > Vincent >
