hi Terry,

Yeah I have the 270mm 240K with twin spots and Metal Kings - not 
saying they dont stop, I just feel they arent working to their 
potential as the rear brakes feel like they reach their limit before 
the fronts begin to "get stopping" :)

Andrew

> Andrew,
> 
> 240K brakes (even the 253mm disc) are generally a vast improvement over
> stock even with drums and R31 discs on the rear are quantum leap up for
> sure, but like anything you do get used to good stopping power over time -
> it's a bit like hp - it's never enough.... You may have very hard pads which
> are very hard to warm up in Canberra at this time of year. I have a lot of
> trouble getting some heat into mine and keeping it there and there's nothing
> worse than some clown doing a brake test in front of you just for the heck
> of it about a K or two after you've set out for work when it's minus 5. It
> happened to me yesterday and it gets your attention and I do like the way
> the front of my 1600 looks as it is.
> 
> The prop valve will not increase the pressure to the fronts in absolute
> terms, what it does do is reduce the pressure to the rear in relative terms,
> (hard to describe that concept) i.e. in other words it increases the
> front/rear bias. If you have the 271mm 240K discs with twin spots then these
> should work very well even without the prop valve as the inbuilt front bias
> is far greater than for the single piston callipers. I have found that the
> 7/8" master does have too much inbuilt rear bias as it was designed to run
> with the valve fitted. On the other hand, a 13/16" master in my opinion is
> for more suited to the single piston calliper eg Girlock 200B etc. It all a
> matter of matching the components for the best performance and then we
> change something and throw the balance out the window again - but at the end
> of the day it is fun.
> 
> regards
> Terry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew
> Greenbury
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 June 2002 11:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Brake Booster
> 
> 
> Terry
> 
> Yep the effort was evident - appreciated thanks. Based on your
> description the previous owner didnt install  a prop valve :(
> I have wondered quietly for a while why others have commented on
> the improvement with 240K brakes installed (and rear drums). On
> mine they (front brakes) have always seemed to have little effect -
> feels like the rears do more braking??! I guess the lack of prop
> valve may have something to do with it?!
> 
> Thanks
> Andrew
> 
> 


--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send  submissions to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to