Umm could be the one in your OP slip?
On 28 Jan, 17:26, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> The Doc, who is the Doc?
>
> On Jan 28, 9:11 am, bruce ralph <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I think the Doc makes some decent points. The problem I would have is
> > wirh the dogmatic tone about the mysteries of the subconcious and the
> > "traps" lurking there to take you in the wrong direction. You know all
> > of the things rattling around in your skull are not either pure good
> > or pure evil. So lets get REAL, find a balance in your thinking and
> > RELAX.
>
> > On Jan 28, 8:31 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Sorry Chazy, but you are wrong.
>
> > > It does not matter who you where talking to really, I did not get
> > > messed up to which post I was replying, I think you are the confused
> > > one.
>
> > > In fact it was Neil who you asked to show you which are the good
> > > questions because you can't sort it from the bullshit. My reply to
> > > you was to help you sort the bullshit.
>
> > > This is a forum you can speak to more than one persson at a time, and
> > > it is not unknown for members to butt in an answer questiins not
> > > possed diectly to them.
>
> > > I attacked you over nothing, please feel free to go back to my first
> > > post to you here and you'll see the tone I took was one of banter, and
> > > all I really done was offer a few examples of how ones state of mind
> > > can effect ones day, which in turn you decided to not answer directly
> > > any of it, but choose rather to subject me to a round of the old game
> > > 'whats wrong with your life then Lee'.
>
> > > Why Chaz do we have to go through this every single time we try to
> > > communcate?
>
> > > Rest assured, I did not get mixed up anywhere, do you get it now, do
> > > you understand, have I made myself clear to you?
>
> > > On 28 Jan, 12:18, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 28, 11:04 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Ohh come on now Chaz, I may be idiotic but an idiot no.
>
> > > > > Are you really trying to tell me that this:
>
> > > > > 'Maybe you should have more control?' Was directed to SD, even though
> > > > > you quoted my previous post above it?
>
> > > > > And that this:
>
> > > > > ' think you might want to ask yourself why you have problems some
> > > > > mornings and not others'
>
> > > > > Was likewise?
>
> > > > > Come on now mate why don't you follow the thread.
>
> > > > No, these comments were directed at you certainly. You might have
> > > > noticed that the posting in which I made those comments was somewhat
> > > > blase - tha is because you had attacked me as if I had responded to
> > > > your posting about getting up in the morning.
> > > > WHilst you are about it, why not answer my points?
> > > > But as I thought your stuff about getting up in the morning was not
> > > > related to my comments to Slip I had initially ignored them.
> > > > In future SO that you know. You should keep your eye on all of the
> > > > ">>" symbols, These will show you exactly to whom, and upon which,
> > > > comments I am commenting on.
> > > > LIke I said look back at the thread and you will see where you went
> > > > wrong.
>
> > > > > On 27 Jan, 22:38, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > LEEEEEE LEEEE LEEEEE
>
> > > > > > Why don't you try to follow the thread?
> > > > > > Archytas and I were talking about Slip Disc's posting, not yours!!!!
> > > > > > Why don't you read it through? You will see if you look carefully,
> > > > > > that in your last posting to me - you had responded to a statement I
> > > > > > was making to Archytas. I had seen your first post on this thread
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > felt it had not followed up from my first response to Slip Disc -
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > then responded as if mine were a response to yours - which it was
> > > > > > not.
> > > > > > You are confused. There is no need to be insulting.
> > > > > > I still don't see how your waking up thing is at all relevant to
> > > > > > Slip's thread.
>
> > > > > > I'll ignore the rest of your rantings because they are not relevant.
>
> > > > > > On Jan 27, 6:04 pm, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Chazy chazy chazy, why do you always do this?
>
> > > > > > > I merely offered an example mate of how ones state of mind can
> > > > > > > effect
> > > > > > > change your life, why then suddenly procliam it as my problem?
>
> > > > > > > I'm not even talking about me, I'm not even talking about you, I'm
> > > > > > > talking about any human.
>
> > > > > > > Okay well lets bring it to a more personal level, as it seems
> > > > > > > that is
> > > > > > > what you like.
>
> > > > > > > Think what your attitude to ohhh I donno, lets just say religion,
> > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > for the fun of it, would be like if you did not feel this anger at
> > > > > > > your percived stupidity of those that hold such views, would be
> > > > > > > like.
>
> > > > > > > Do you think it would be any diferant? Do you think for example,
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > may have somethin more meaningfull to contribute to debate than
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > standard rant like 'Perhaps you could point them out. I can't
> > > > > > > seem to
> > > > > > > sieve them out of
> > > > > > > the BS. '
>
> > > > > > > Do you even understand that your dislike, disgust, and disbelife
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > what you percive to be stupidity, colours how you interact with
> > > > > > > people. Do you not think that by changing your state of mind when
> > > > > > > talking to people like, ohh me I guess, that you may well get
> > > > > > > something out of these little to-and-fro's?
>
> > > > > > > Can you now add anything to the debate, or shall I expect more
> > > > > > > 'reactionary Chaz'?
>
> > > > > > > On 27 Jan, 17:55, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Jan 27, 5:49 pm, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Then allow me.
>
> > > > > > > > > Chazy babe, do you think that by having a certian state of
> > > > > > > > > mind you
> > > > > > > > > cannot effect real change in your life?
>
> > > > > > > > Of course you can. However any state of mind is determined by
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > state of your life. I fail to see how any of this relates to my
> > > > > > > > posting above.
>
> > > > > > > > > A for instance perhaps.
>
> > > > > > > > > For instance if you 'wake up on the wrong side of the bed'
> > > > > > > > > get ready
> > > > > > > > > for work, leave the house only to have a car drive through a
> > > > > > > > > puddle
> > > > > > > > > and splashes your clothes, what are the chances of you losing
> > > > > > > > > your rag
> > > > > > > > > over it?
>
> > > > > > > > I never let trivia rile me. Maybe you should have more control?
>
> > > > > > > > > Now imagine, waking up in a happy mood, you have some great
> > > > > > > > > thing to
> > > > > > > > > look forward to today and your mood is so buoyant it could
> > > > > > > > > make things
> > > > > > > > > fly, when the car comes around and splashes your clothes, how
> > > > > > > > > do you
> > > > > > > > > feel?
>
> > > > > > > > I think you might want to ask yourself why you have problems
> > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > mornings and not others. I usually have reasons for my state of
> > > > > > > > mind
> > > > > > > > of a morning - How about you?
>
> > > > > > > > > Would there be a differance do you think?
>
> > > > > > > > No, there might be a "difference" though.
> > > > > > > > What is your point?
>
> > > > > > > > > On 27 Jan, 17:14, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Jan 27, 4:39 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I used to start an MA research methods class with a magic
> > > > > > > > > > > act. I
> > > > > > > > > > > thought it a good way of looking at the differences
> > > > > > > > > > > between illusion
> > > > > > > > > > > and reality and an example of how easily we can be
> > > > > > > > > > > bulled. Slip is
> > > > > > > > > > > teasing, yet there are good questions.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Perhaps you could point them out. I can't seem to sieve
> > > > > > > > > > them out of
> > > > > > > > > > the BS.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On 27 Jan, 15:24, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 25, 5:13 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that it? Are there no scientific data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > demonstrating the existence
> > > > > > > > > > > > > or not of mental capacity, the transition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > subconscious to reality?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What of Edgar Cayce, Uri Geller, Randi, Libet, Esp,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > telekinesis,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > psychic phenomena, apparitions, stigmata and the many
> > > > > > > > > > > > > discussions
> > > > > > > > > > > > > taken place here regarding these issues?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > All of this is demonstrably Bullshit.
> > > > > > > > > > > > It is curious that you have Randi in the list - it his
> > > > > > > > > > > > he more than
> > > > > > > > > > > > most that has shown all this stuff to be a collection
> > > > > > > > > > > > of conjuring
> > > > > > > > > > > > tricks and weak minded nonsense. The best person I have
> > > > > > > > > > > > seen to
> > > > > > > > > > > > demonstrate "mentalism" is Derren Brown. He can read
> > > > > > > > > > > > minds, levitate
> > > > > > > > > > > > tables walk on glass, make impossible predictions - the
> > > > > > > > > > > > whole bang-
> > > > > > > > > > > > shoot, though he says NONE of it has the slightest
> > > > > > > > > > > > thing to do with
> > > > > > > > > > > > ESP - its just great psychology; no magic, just
> > > > > > > > > > > > illusion.
> > > > > > > > > > > > There is however a serious and tragic need to believe
> > > > > > > > > > > > and even HIS
> > > > > > > > > > > > audiences go away thinking they have seen magic.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Have we reached the point of
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > burnout or has rationale become so finite as to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > totally dismiss on the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > basis of disbelief or absurdity? Is there any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > correlation between
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jung's Shadow concept and that of Murphy's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > presentation? Have some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > possibly become locked into that which has dominated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > their own
> > > > > > > > > > > > > subconscious? The road is not a straight line and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the earth is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > flat, cosmic energy and mental awareness is ever
> > > > > > > > > > > > > present.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/04/mind_decision
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > How about > Even 60 milliseconds of exposure to a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > brand name such as
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
