With a name like Slip Disc, you're in, but it's a toss up whether you'd be the
Jack Black comic relief character who shows everyone the error of their driving
ways, AND how to love again, or the antagonist villain, two time fender bender
offender, determined to sabotage any chance at happiness for our heroes.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
--- Begin Message ---
Can I at least be the traffic school instructor?
On May 7, 8:24 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well then you have your next three screenplay ideas all set to go. You can
> collaborate with Fran for clever multilingual wordplay which may be lost on
> the American audiences, and Neil will make an outstanding Executive Editor,
> putting his deconstruction skills to work on your masterpieces.
>
> For 'Limits of Desire', let me bounce this off you:
>
> Lee's the rowdy blue collar rugged type, whose infectious smile and booming
> laugh is matched only by the length of his turban. Ornamental is the Sean
> Connery-ish world hardened Professor with a well hidden heart of gold. Rosey
> is the free spirited woman both would love but neither could have. The drama
> unfolds within the setting of a court ordered traffic school for habitual
> speeders.
>
> Eh? It has Summer Blockbuster written all over it. :-D
>
>
>
> [ Attached Message ]From:gabbydott <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\""
> <[email protected]>Date:Thu, 7 May 2009 06:00:19 -0700
> (PDT)Local:Thurs, May 7 2009 8:00 amSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the
> nature of Love?
>
> But that's what I mean! Limits of desire ... peaks of fulfillment ...
> bare depths - that's Paramount Pictures! Bingo! :-)
>
> On 7 Mai, 14:31, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > *laughing* What exactly are you responding to, Gabs? Your tangents are
> > entertaining, but near impossible to respond to given their near complete
> > disconnect with anything that's actually been posted. Has begging been on
> > your mind, or is it American ideals that has you flamed up?
>
> > For the benefit of your understanding, since I doubt anyone else had a hard
> > time with it, I was speaking of exploring the limits of desire...begging
> > doesn't factor into that at all. If you have to beg for intimacy, the
> > relationship has far deeper issues. Given that I'm speaking of reaching the
> > peaks of fulfillment, and you're focused on the bare depths of barely
> > togetherness, I don't think you're following along...your translator
> > license has been revoked! It's ok though...ich liebe dich anyways...
>
> > [ Angehängte Nachricht ]Von:gabbydott <[email protected]>In:"\"Minds
> > Eye\"" <[email protected]>Datum:Thu, 7 May 2009 04:54:02 -0700
> > (PDT)Lokal:Do 7 Mai 2009 13:54Betreff:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the nature
> > of Love?
>
> > I thought you had travelled the world, Chris. And what did you do
> > there? Went to the local movie theatres? Americans and how they live
> > their belief in ideals. *sigh*
>
> > OK, let me translate "to please others" for you. In international
> > terms it means "begging" and is strictly unerotic.
>
> > On 7 Mai, 06:45, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > In classical psychology, it's the Madonna-Whore complex. In modern
> > > culture, Ludacris calls out for "a Lady in the streets but a freak in
> > > the bed!" The clash of puritanical public values with animalistic
> > > private sexual desires creates a conflict that men (and less often
> > > women) who are not honest with themselves and/or their partners often
> > > express extra-relationally. In the ideal Eros relationship (ever
> > > IMHO), honest communication and a desire to please the other allows
> > > for mutual open exploration of the poles of desire, negating the
> > > desire to engage in such dalliances. Despite a variety of cultural
> > > relational phenotypes to choose from, I believe monogamy to be the
> > > Eros ideal.
>
> > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:06 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Somewhat over-long as I remember Chris. An old French mate of mine
> > > > kept two mistresses - one who treated him like a mother. He was
> > > > somewhat surprised that I didn't approve, even suspecting I was in
> > > > love with his wife because of this. Sadly, I was only in love with
> > > > her cooking and brilliant sense of humour. He was a very gentle soul,
> > > > except when it came to arresting blaggers known to use violence and
> > > > intimidation on women.
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
--- End Message ---
