Giving the fact (reality) of what inovation and quality (the current
system) has brought the majority of US citizens, (no, not including
those sucking at the public trough) I guess I will take such a
perceived 'stifle', even though it will put a few criminals out of
business. We are the only 'modern' state that continues to see
healthcare as a bottom line business rather than a necessity of life.

On Aug 28, 3:23 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Eh?  Oh, because I work for the State of Texas and they pay for my health
> care I suppose that means I'm using government sponsored health care.  That
> would be accurate.  My concern, iam, is that competition will be eliminated
> under a single payer system.  Despite some of the rhetoric coming from
> proponents of the as yet unfully formed Health Care Reform Bill I believe
> this is the goal.  I think this will stifle inovation and absolutely cripple
> quality.  I hope I am wrong.
>
> I, of course, have no interest in cutting off my nose to spite my face.  I
> will take full atvantage of any government programs offered just as I expect
> my fellow citizens to do.  That doesn't mean I think they are a good idea or
> good for our country.  Instead of spending time earning a living or exceling
> at my job to get a promotion to buy better health care/faster car/bigger
> house etc. I'll be spending my talents and efforts into finding government
> programs to take advantage of.  I just don't see this sort of thing as
> productive for society as a whole.  Again, I hope I'm wrong.
>
> dj
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:22 AM, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Don  I know you have government sponsored health care   does that mean you
> > are willing to give up your social health care because it is universal
> > government health care?
> > Allan
>
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:05 AM,
> >> ornamentalmind<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > "This is human nature. Sneaky and selfish to the bitter end." = DJ
>
> >> > IF wanting to see universal healthcare for all rather than the only
> >> > for the elite, then give me some of that selfishness!
>
> >> Ah, yes.  The end justifies the means.  There are many over the years
> >> that share this same philosophy with you.  Chairman Mao, Joseph
> >> Stalin, Saul Alinsky, etc., etc.
>
> >> dj
>
> >> > On Aug 27, 12:24 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> Too many factors left undefined.  Is he guilty?  If so, what did he
> >> >> do?  If he stole a car drunk and ran over a kid getting off a school
> >> >> bus by accident then I want him to come home.  If he buggered(very
> >> >> popular word in ME lately) my son I'd let him die in prison and not go
> >> >> to the funeral.  There are qualifiers for everything.  As rule, I'd
> >> >> vote against a policy of compassionate early release.  That doesn't
> >> >> mean I wouldn't do my best to circumvent this rule if it benefited me
> >> >> somehow.   Case in point; the late Senator Edward Kennedy's dying wish
> >> >> was to reverse a rule he supported 4 years ago that benefited the
> >> >> Democratic party at the time and screwed the republicans.  Now the
> >> >> shoe is on the other foot and he shamelessly wanted things back the
> >> >> way they were before he made the change.  This is human nature.
> >> >> Sneaky and selfish to the bitter end.
>
> >> >> dj
>
> >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:49 AM,
>
> >> >> [email protected]<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> >> > Sorry sir I totaly disagree, lets measure up your one example against
> >> >> > what could be considerd the norm.  A quick straw poll should suffice.
>
> >> >> > So hands up all of those members here if caught up in the same
> >> >> > situation would like to see their father or son come home to die, and
> >> >> > hands up all of those who would not?
>
> >> >> > On 26 Aug, 10:49, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >> For sure, Lee, especially in consideration of the nature of these
> >> >> >> crimes, the heinous and monstrous intent.  Not to mention the
> >> cultural
> >> >> >> aspect, as I pointed out earlier and provided a link, the Muslim
> >> >> >> family wants the teenage girl, (their own daughter) dead just on the
> >> >> >> basis of religious conversion.  But your assumption in a case where
> >> >> >> that girl was in prison for a heinous crime would be that the family
> >> >> >> was suffering and felt punished and that it would be compassionate
> >> to
> >> >> >> let the girl out of prison, send her home to her family because she
> >> >> >> was terminally ill.    Unreasonable assumption? Absolutely!
>
> >> >> >> On Aug 26, 4:01 am, "[email protected]" <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > Slip I have admited there is a bit of that about it, but as I have
> >> >> >> > asked you do you belive it is an 'unreasonable' assumption to
> >> make?
>
> >> >> >> > On 26 Aug, 08:58, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > > Don, logically there is no basis for Lee's view.  It's all based
> >> on
> >> >> >> > > assumptive reasoning.  We don't know how these family members
> >> are
> >> >> >> > > feeling and cannot presume they are suffering or feeling
> >> punished by
> >> >> >> > > the incarceration or by society and again if al-megrahi lives
> >> through
> >> >> >> > > a whole year there is going to be some heads rolling.  I saw one
> >> of
> >> >> >> > > the victims stating that her husband was supposed to die of
> >> cancer 5
> >> >> >> > > years ago and he's still around.
>
> >> >> >> > > On Aug 25, 11:43 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > > >  Why should the inocent be punished? -Lee
>
> >> >> >> > > > They aren't punished.  I don't doubt they suffer but it's
> >> incorrect to
> >> >> >> > > > say they are punished.  They are, I suppose in a way, also
> >> victims of
> >> >> >> > > > their relative's actions.  As I think Slip touched on earlier
> >> the only
> >> >> >> > > > person that owes these people something is the perpetrator of
> >> the
> >> >> >> > > > crime.  Certainly I understand compassion for them.  It
> >> doesn't make
> >> >> >> > > > me want to release a hardened criminal to make them feel
> >> better.
>
> >> >> >> > > > I'm not sure how many of you took the time to read Tink's
> >> little bio.
> >> >> >> > > > What stood out for me is his attitude that his incarceration
> >> was
> >> >> >> > > > unjustified because his infractions were minimal.  I saw a
> >> pattern of
> >> >> >> > > > 'poor me, I'm the victim.'  This, in my admittedly limited
> >> experience,
> >> >> >> > > > seems a quite common attitude amongst convicts.  Recidivism
> >> being what
> >> >> >> > > > it is I'd want to address this personality flaw were I the
> >> criminal
> >> >> >> > > > type.
>
> >> >> >> > > > I'm just sayin'
>
> >> >> >> > > > dj
>
> >> >> >> > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:10 AM,
>
> >> >> >> > > > [email protected]<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > > > >> By your logic we should show compassion to a pair of
> >> murderers because
> >> >> >> > > > >> they are, lets say, orphans.  Never mind they are orphans
> >> because they
> >> >> >> > > > >> murdered their parents for the inheritance.  It would be
> >> hypocritical
> >> >> >> > > > >> of me to concern myself with HOW they became orphans, yes?
> >>  The poor
> >> >> >> > > > >> dears deserve our sympathy.
>
> >> >> >> > > > > Opps forgot to address this.
>
> >> >> >> > > > > You assume dear boy that the compassion I speak of is to the
> >> man
> >> >> >> > > > > realsed, and yes there is some there, but I mean mostly his
> >> family.
> >> >> >> > > > > Why should the inocent be punished?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > (
> >  )
> > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to