Interesting that you chose a Baha'i library as one of your resources.
I am familiar with that religion and of all the religions I've gotten
close to, Baha'i is one of the most rational and concerned with the
true well-being of humans -- Catholicism being at the other extreme.
Yet after three years of being intensely involved with Baha'i, I
finally left it as well since regardless of its rationality and
concern, it's members corrupted it and twisted it to their own
purposes as they have with all religions.

Regarding your primary question, it has always puzzled me how anyone
can conceive of the seat of consciousness as being anywhere else but
in the mind.  I do understand that many put the center of emotion in
their hearts and stomachs because that is where they mostly feel it to
be.  But the mind -- for me at least -- has it's center in the brain.
I can feel my consciousness, thoughts, memories and ruminations
centered there.

A table is a what I have come to call a table as a result of adopting
that designation for anything which has a more or less flat surface
upon which objects can be placed.  It has a hard surface and generally
is raised above ground level by things we call legs or mounts.  I can
physically appreciate it's composition and makeup and thus can
extrapolate from the specific to the general so that I am able to call
any number of variations on that theme as a table.  Tables can change
however.  They can become platforms, daises, shelves, tinder (if made
of wood), and many other things, depending on who is perceiving that
object and for what purpose.  They have a substance and form which we
have come to recognize as a table.

Yet as with anything in our universe, it's perceivable reality depends
in great deal on the perceiver.  This can also be carried out in
absurd extrapolations that question whether or not anything is real
but that is just a mental game we sometimes tend to play.

On Sep 9, 1:14 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, we have been addressing quite a few rather heady topics recently.
> I thought that in order to help some of the materialists get up to
> speed philosophically, I would start a topic on emptiness. This notion
> is near the core of much I have been writing recently. It directly
> addresses the nature of reality in a scientific way albeit with a
> different approach than that which can be addressed by the science
> most are familiar with.
>
> Why would one say or even suggest that the brain is not where
> consciousness resides? Why would  one suggest that what we feel and
> see is in fact not there? …valid questions. And, little within the
> western tradition of philosophy will address these and other
> metaphysical issues…except perhaps science when it comes to the actual
> nature of things say physically exist…and, of course, this does
> include ‘us’…and our brains, thus that which many demand is the seat
> of consciousness. So…here I ask you to become a true skeptic and
> examine  very closely the things you see and feel. What is the nature
> of a table? Does it exist? How do we know a table is a table? Does a
> table ever change what it is? Etc.
>
> To get a better view of some of the issues for those willing to take
> the red pill and not remain in the habit of eating blue pills, I will
> introduce you to one of the greatest philosophers of all time,
> Nagarjuna. Vam may have some clear and perhaps opposing views, and, I
> hope for a lively discussion.
>
> How could he come to find that emptiness is the ultimate cosmology?
> Why would you not agree with him?
>
> http://www.iep.utm.edu/nagarjun/http://bahai-library.com/personal/jw/other.pubs/nagarjuna/
> (a couple of resources)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to