Gruff, this is just to stimulate some reflection.

What is a ' table,'  of which term you are so clear and convinced
about, in the eyes of a baby or child who has never seen or heard of a
table before ?

Is it still a ' table,' the one you mean ?  Is it something specific,
but not known or understood ?  Is it something but not specific, and
unknown ?  Or, is it ' nothing ?'

On Sep 10, 7:02 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Interesting that you chose a Baha'i library as one of your resources.
> I am familiar with that religion and of all the religions I've gotten
> close to, Baha'i is one of the most rational and concerned with the
> true well-being of humans -- Catholicism being at the other extreme.
> Yet after three years of being intensely involved with Baha'i, I
> finally left it as well since regardless of its rationality and
> concern, it's members corrupted it and twisted it to their own
> purposes as they have with all religions.
>
> Regarding your primary question, it has always puzzled me how anyone
> can conceive of the seat of consciousness as being anywhere else but
> in the mind.  I do understand that many put the center of emotion in
> their hearts and stomachs because that is where they mostly feel it to
> be.  But the mind -- for me at least -- has it's center in the brain.
> I can feel my consciousness, thoughts, memories and ruminations
> centered there.
>
> A table is a what I have come to call a table as a result of adopting
> that designation for anything which has a more or less flat surface
> upon which objects can be placed.  It has a hard surface and generally
> is raised above ground level by things we call legs or mounts.  I can
> physically appreciate it's composition and makeup and thus can
> extrapolate from the specific to the general so that I am able to call
> any number of variations on that theme as a table.  Tables can change
> however.  They can become platforms, daises, shelves, tinder (if made
> of wood), and many other things, depending on who is perceiving that
> object and for what purpose.  They have a substance and form which we
> have come to recognize as a table.
>
> Yet as with anything in our universe, it's perceivable reality depends
> in great deal on the perceiver.  This can also be carried out in
> absurd extrapolations that question whether or not anything is real
> but that is just a mental game we sometimes tend to play.
>
> On Sep 9, 1:14 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > So, we have been addressing quite a few rather heady topics recently.
> > I thought that in order to help some of the materialists get up to
> > speed philosophically, I would start a topic on emptiness. This notion
> > is near the core of much I have been writing recently. It directly
> > addresses the nature of reality in a scientific way albeit with a
> > different approach than that which can be addressed by the science
> > most are familiar with.
>
> > Why would one say or even suggest that the brain is not where
> > consciousness resides? Why would  one suggest that what we feel and
> > see is in fact not there? …valid questions. And, little within the
> > western tradition of philosophy will address these and other
> > metaphysical issues…except perhaps science when it comes to the actual
> > nature of things say physically exist…and, of course, this does
> > include ‘us’…and our brains, thus that which many demand is the seat
> > of consciousness. So…here I ask you to become a true skeptic and
> > examine  very closely the things you see and feel. What is the nature
> > of a table? Does it exist? How do we know a table is a table? Does a
> > table ever change what it is? Etc.
>
> > To get a better view of some of the issues for those willing to take
> > the red pill and not remain in the habit of eating blue pills, I will
> > introduce you to one of the greatest philosophers of all time,
> > Nagarjuna. Vam may have some clear and perhaps opposing views, and, I
> > hope for a lively discussion.
>
> > How could he come to find that emptiness is the ultimate cosmology?
> > Why would you not agree with him?
>
> >http://www.iep.utm.edu/nagarjun/http://bahai-library.com/personal/jw/...
> > (a couple of resources)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to