" ... binds one TO time."

Actually, it is to be bound to ' idea ' of time which, with our
conditioning to the idea, becomes concrete, so to say, and remains as
something primordially definite and real as Time !

This indeed is the classical meaning of ' attachment ' ( and
detachment ).

On Jan 15, 10:13 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 14 Jan, 16:54, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Ed;
> > A matter of choice at what point and where does one make the choice.
> > Acquisition of experience that is causal to ascension might be and
> > obverse be the falling from grace.  The entry into this realm seems
> > locked in, tied down and as you say subject to the laws, challenges
> > and opportunities that become the playing field of success or failure
> > according to and if there are actual adherents to be applied.  I would
> > think that if there exists souls that they would all have a uniformity
> > as far as choice or not and if not who/what decides such things.
> > I believe that some people have lived past lives but not all as some
> > people are Old Souls, ie: child prodigies, brilliant scientists etc.,
> > while others are New Souls ie: idiots without a clue who are easily
> > identifiable.   I would not consider reincarnation in the sense that
> > our soul returns in the form of a different species but contend the
> > soul returns as another human being.  A human soul does not return as
> > a cow in my opinion.  I think we retain life experiences within our
> > soul and think life might be occurring simultaneously on different
> > planes and further that there is a level at which time itself is of no
> > consequence.  The concept of old soul and new soul has been a
> > contentious subject for my wife and I as she is deeply rooted in
> > Catholicism and therefore won't accept it other than as a ridiculous
> > notion.  According to her Catholic faith, death is the "complete and
> > final separation of the soul from the body". However the Vatican has
> > conceded that diagnosing death is a subject for medicine, not the
> > Church.  Pope Pius XII questioned whether doctors might be "continuing
> > the resuscitation process, despite the fact that the soul may already
> > have left the body."
> > Others believe that life remains intact as long as the heart is
> > beating and others still contend that the mind and body are one so
> > being brain dead has not impact on death itself.  It seems that belief
> > in certain aspects of death may give credence to what some know as
> > Heaven and the immortality of the soul.  For atheists, pantheists,
> > materialists and rationalists there would be no question and
> > conversation of such idea would be moot. So what meaning does death
> > have to us as we are living?  Perhaps it is a reminder that life is
> > temporary and that we should pay heed to what lies ahead without
> > paying as much attention to amassing materialistic treasures over
> > spiritual values.  
>
> This is, almost word for word, a quote from the Qur'an.  Allah states
> in the Qur'an that life is a test and temporary and that we should,
> indeed, pay more attention to the life hereafter, as THAT is eternal.
> Of course, any amount of time spent outside of space-time would SEEM
> eternal, as one is outside of time, therefore, eternal/timeless.  That
> is, a 'soul' would experience any time spent outside of space-time as
> eternal, even if they were gone for only a second (of time with
> respect to time WITHIN space-time).  Therefore, all rewards and
> punishments in the hereafter would SEEM eternal, even though there may
> have only been a few seconds between incarnations.  That is, if re-
> incarnation DOES exist.  It's certainly not outside the scope of my
> physics, as in my physics, consciousness isn't actually IN space-time
> (it's in the Calabi-Yau space), but being incarnated binds one TO
> time.  Once an iinterface to space-time has been set-up, i.e.,
> incarnated (or invegatated if one happens to be a plant--you see, I
> can't be specieist!!), it is bound to time, but, at death, they return
> to their natural, eternal state in the Calabi-Yau.  And, of course,
> there could well be parts of the Calabi-Yau that are apportioned as
> places of reward (Heaven) or punishment (Hell).  String theory allows
> for this, but no OTHER paradigm does.
>
>
>
> > Is death just a marker between lives?  Possibly
> > and for me most likely,  no one has ever come back to tell us anything
> > about it.  Is there a Karma that carries from one life to the next?  I
> > would think that if the soul retains it's accumulated properties then
> > it might also retain the aspects of retribution.  Upon new life in the
> > new physical frame is there a clean slate with which to develop?   I
> > often wonder why some people are born into extreme poverty and pain
> > while other live wonderful lives.  While both will have to commit to
> > death the interim of life seems to have significance in the fact that
> > maybe there is for them a lesson to be learned.  I would also have to
> > examine why it is that a person is born and dies within hours of
> > living if there is any significance to life between birth and death. I
> > believe that everyone has a soul unique to their self.  To think that
> > souls are just random formations of different lives would imply that
> > upon death our soul becomes part of a huge soul pool or becomes part
> > of the zero point field. How could we retain soul integrity if we die
> > and our soul is dispersed into a pool?  I would rather think my life
> > reflects all the lives I have lived before, not that my life is
> > fractions of Attila the Hun and King Herod etc.  What determines who
> > gets what from the soul pool?   People are all so different and there
> > is no uniformity, obviously I didn't get any Philo Farnsworth.  What
> > would govern the outcome of future lives? Is there a relation to the
> > gene pool in how a person returns to live again? Possibly so.  If a
> > person has the same genetic makeup as the great grandfather, is that
> > person partially living the life of the great grandfather, in thought
> > and action?
> > Is there a correlation?
>
> > On Jan 14, 2:02 am, edward mason <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Perhaps the Earth-journey is a matter of choice  which provides
> > > experiences for ascensions and/or developments( Experience ) that
> > > holds some special honor but can be acquired no other way. Once that
> > > soul inters this realm of existence, becoming subject to the
> > > controlling laws which acts kind of like a magnet to keep that soul in
> > > the cycle of circumference until it master the Laws. This would not
> > > imply that every soul here on earth is here as a mater of choice
> > > either, as some are sure to assume.
>
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Possibly it is time for a review of the existence of a soul or not.
> > > > Those souls that are imbued with favoritism of sorts, not exactly the
> > > > terminology, and others who are cursed.
> > > > Let's say that previous soul enhancements lend to current living
> > > > phenomena.
> > > > Other questions arise, such as earth being a proving ground or a trial
> > > > period, even a place for people to suffer damnation, people have lived
> > > > horrible lives and others have suffered horrible deaths.
> > > > Who knows for sure, not eye saith the blind man.
> > > > Any variations are as well valid hypothesis.
>
> > > > On Jan 13, 3:33 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> > > >>  I am not making any statement about causation. The fact is that some 
> > > >> people are luckier than others -- both ways. I don't know what to make 
> > > >> of it.
>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Chris Jenkins <[email protected]>
> > > >> To: [email protected]
> > > >> Sent: Wed, Jan 13, 2010 4:13 pm
> > > >> Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Karma
>
> > > >> Yes. And it does appear that the sun orbits our planet, rising in the 
> > > >> east, and setting in the west.
>
> > > >> Correlation != causation.
>
> > > >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:10 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >>  Yet it does appear as if some people, and places either have good or 
> > > >> bad luck in greater proportions than others.
>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: frantheman <[email protected]>
> > > >> To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]>
>
> > > >> Sent: Wed, Jan 13, 2010 1:40 pm
> > > >> Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Karma
>
> > > >> On 13 Jan., 18:44, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> > There is no "born lucky" or "born unlucky". There is merely the 
> > > >> > randomness
>
> > > >> > of the universe, and the series of decisions a person makes in their
>
> > > >> > lifetime leading to different paths of causality.
>
> > > >> True, Chris. That said, I feel lucky this evening not to have been
>
> > > >> born (or live) in Haiti ...
>
> > > >> Francis
>
> > > >> --
>
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > >> Groups
>
> > > >> ""Minds Eye"" group.
>
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > >> [email protected].
>
> > > >> For more options, visit this group 
> > > >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > >> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > >> [email protected].
> > > >> For more options, visit this group 
> > > >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > >> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > >> [email protected].
> > > >> For more options, visit this group 
> > > >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > > [email protected].
> > > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to