Not as riveting as a blindfolded and knitting Yoko but here 'tis
anyway.  I hated this band in high school but whistled the tune
anyway.  Very catchy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEhXcEpajN0

-Don


On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:36 PM, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Somehow, John's been spooking around in my head quite a bit lately ...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqP3wT5lpa4
>
> Francis
>
> On 14 Jan., 17:54, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ed;
>> A matter of choice at what point and where does one make the choice.
>> Acquisition of experience that is causal to ascension might be and
>> obverse be the falling from grace.  The entry into this realm seems
>> locked in, tied down and as you say subject to the laws, challenges
>> and opportunities that become the playing field of success or failure
>> according to and if there are actual adherents to be applied.  I would
>> think that if there exists souls that they would all have a uniformity
>> as far as choice or not and if not who/what decides such things.
>> I believe that some people have lived past lives but not all as some
>> people are Old Souls, ie: child prodigies, brilliant scientists etc.,
>> while others are New Souls ie: idiots without a clue who are easily
>> identifiable.   I would not consider reincarnation in the sense that
>> our soul returns in the form of a different species but contend the
>> soul returns as another human being.  A human soul does not return as
>> a cow in my opinion.  I think we retain life experiences within our
>> soul and think life might be occurring simultaneously on different
>> planes and further that there is a level at which time itself is of no
>> consequence.  The concept of old soul and new soul has been a
>> contentious subject for my wife and I as she is deeply rooted in
>> Catholicism and therefore won't accept it other than as a ridiculous
>> notion.  According to her Catholic faith, death is the "complete and
>> final separation of the soul from the body". However the Vatican has
>> conceded that diagnosing death is a subject for medicine, not the
>> Church.  Pope Pius XII questioned whether doctors might be "continuing
>> the resuscitation process, despite the fact that the soul may already
>> have left the body."
>> Others believe that life remains intact as long as the heart is
>> beating and others still contend that the mind and body are one so
>> being brain dead has not impact on death itself.  It seems that belief
>> in certain aspects of death may give credence to what some know as
>> Heaven and the immortality of the soul.  For atheists, pantheists,
>> materialists and rationalists there would be no question and
>> conversation of such idea would be moot. So what meaning does death
>> have to us as we are living?  Perhaps it is a reminder that life is
>> temporary and that we should pay heed to what lies ahead without
>> paying as much attention to amassing materialistic treasures over
>> spiritual values.   Is death just a marker between lives?  Possibly
>> and for me most likely,  no one has ever come back to tell us anything
>> about it.  Is there a Karma that carries from one life to the next?  I
>> would think that if the soul retains it's accumulated properties then
>> it might also retain the aspects of retribution.  Upon new life in the
>> new physical frame is there a clean slate with which to develop?   I
>> often wonder why some people are born into extreme poverty and pain
>> while other live wonderful lives.  While both will have to commit to
>> death the interim of life seems to have significance in the fact that
>> maybe there is for them a lesson to be learned.  I would also have to
>> examine why it is that a person is born and dies within hours of
>> living if there is any significance to life between birth and death. I
>> believe that everyone has a soul unique to their self.  To think that
>> souls are just random formations of different lives would imply that
>> upon death our soul becomes part of a huge soul pool or becomes part
>> of the zero point field. How could we retain soul integrity if we die
>> and our soul is dispersed into a pool?  I would rather think my life
>> reflects all the lives I have lived before, not that my life is
>> fractions of Attila the Hun and King Herod etc.  What determines who
>> gets what from the soul pool?   People are all so different and there
>> is no uniformity, obviously I didn't get any Philo Farnsworth.  What
>> would govern the outcome of future lives? Is there a relation to the
>> gene pool in how a person returns to live again? Possibly so.  If a
>> person has the same genetic makeup as the great grandfather, is that
>> person partially living the life of the great grandfather, in thought
>> and action?
>> Is there a correlation?
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2:02 am, edward mason <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Perhaps the Earth-journey is a matter of choice  which provides
>> > experiences for ascensions and/or developments( Experience ) that
>> > holds some special honor but can be acquired no other way. Once that
>> > soul inters this realm of existence, becoming subject to the
>> > controlling laws which acts kind of like a magnet to keep that soul in
>> > the cycle of circumference until it master the Laws. This would not
>> > imply that every soul here on earth is here as a mater of choice
>> > either, as some are sure to assume.
>>
>> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > Possibly it is time for a review of the existence of a soul or not.
>> > > Those souls that are imbued with favoritism of sorts, not exactly the
>> > > terminology, and others who are cursed.
>> > > Let's say that previous soul enhancements lend to current living
>> > > phenomena.
>> > > Other questions arise, such as earth being a proving ground or a trial
>> > > period, even a place for people to suffer damnation, people have lived
>> > > horrible lives and others have suffered horrible deaths.
>> > > Who knows for sure, not eye saith the blind man.
>> > > Any variations are as well valid hypothesis.
>>
>> > > On Jan 13, 3:33 pm, [email protected] wrote:
>> > >>  I am not making any statement about causation. The fact is that some 
>> > >> people are luckier than others -- both ways. I don't know what to make 
>> > >> of it.
>>
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Chris Jenkins <[email protected]>
>> > >> To: [email protected]
>> > >> Sent: Wed, Jan 13, 2010 4:13 pm
>> > >> Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Karma
>>
>> > >> Yes. And it does appear that the sun orbits our planet, rising in the 
>> > >> east, and setting in the west.
>>
>> > >> Correlation != causation.
>>
>> > >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:10 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > >>  Yet it does appear as if some people, and places either have good or 
>> > >> bad luck in greater proportions than others.
>>
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: frantheman <[email protected]>
>> > >> To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]>
>>
>> > >> Sent: Wed, Jan 13, 2010 1:40 pm
>> > >> Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Karma
>>
>> > >> On 13 Jan., 18:44, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > >> > There is no "born lucky" or "born unlucky". There is merely the 
>> > >> > randomness
>>
>> > >> > of the universe, and the series of decisions a person makes in their
>>
>> > >> > lifetime leading to different paths of causality.
>>
>> > >> True, Chris. That said, I feel lucky this evening not to have been
>>
>> > >> born (or live) in Haiti ...
>>
>> > >> Francis
>>
>> > >> --
>>
>> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> > >> Groups
>>
>> > >> ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>
>> > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>
>> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > >> [email protected].
>>
>> > >> For more options, visit this group 
>> > >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>>
>> > >> --
>> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> > >> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > >> [email protected].
>> > >> For more options, visit this group 
>> > >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>>
>> > >> --
>> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> > >> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > >> [email protected].
>> > >> For more options, visit this group 
>> > >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>>
>> > > --
>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> > > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > > [email protected].
>> > > For more options, visit this group 
>> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to