One's truth may be true and still dangerous or irritating to others. I
think we have pieces of truths but respect- or try to respect-
different points of view.

No- just an earthquake in Japan. How about you?

On Mar 12, 10:17 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> No Rigsy being true to oneself does not stop you from being a social
> person..  but is it a rough day today?
> Allan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:28 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I disagree, Allan. We are social creatures, afterall. One's truth may
> > be a falsehood and dangerous or irritating to others.
>
> > On Mar 12, 1:33 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Your only obligation in any lifetime is be true to yourself
> > > Allan
>
> > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:34 PM, pol.science kid <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > you know..another thing here...struck me kind of
> > > > late...re-enforcement....acknowledging of our 'achievement'...the basic
> > need
> > > > for approval...rewards..and constant need for proving...does it have
> > > > anything to do with the underlying psychological social bent ...and are
> > they
> > > > necessarily innate...
>
> > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:02 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> I do agree with the innate idea- thinking of the joy an infant feels
> > > >> when learning to stand/walk/toss food off his highchair tray,etc. But
> > > >> that joy is best when encouraged by parents or caregivers and that
> > > >> bonus really doesn't change much through life. An individual can feel
> > > >> a sense of accomplishment on his own yet still yearns for re-
> > > >> enforcement of some sort- of which their are many- one could even
> > > >> depend on abstract rewards.// Family, religion, education, society are
> > > >> some of the more important channels we must choose how to swim/
> > > >> navigate and our own individual nature may have to oppose rather than
> > > >> comply which can be subtle or violent and everything in-between. I
> > > >> feel rebellion against authority is a natural state of becoming a
> > > >> distinct individual but all rests on method and outcome. Another
> > > >> factor is maturity- often our understanding of and empathy for our
> > > >> parents comes round when we become parents, for instance
>
> > > >> On Mar 9, 6:18 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > PSK, the notion of feeling empowered *IF* associated with actual
> > being/
> > > >> > will, is innate. Such an experience one either is aware of or asleep
> > > >> > to along with differing levels of perception.
>
> > > >> > Conditions?...it can make a difference; however, the same setting
> > for
> > > >> > different people will often result in different levels of awareness
> > of
> > > >> > will so as I see it, other factors are of more importance.
>
> > > >> > On Mar 9, 2:45 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> > > As you say....the modes are both only different methods of
> > percieving
> > > >> > > perhaps....what i want to know orn...is when does an individual
> > feel
> > > >> > > empowered....an individual...a will...an active will....what
> > > >> attributes to
> > > >> > > it...what conditions...is it more likely in a certain
> > setting.....i
> > > >> hope i
> > > >> > > make sense
>
> > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, ornamentalmind
> > > >> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > >> > > > “i guess ..i meant a secular rather than a religious or
> > theological
> > > >> > > > mode of
> > > >> > > > understanding things...the world.... “ – PSK
>
> > > >> > > > Well, that does point towards an area of your beliefs so thanks
> > for
> > > >> > > > this much. Perhaps you could be even more specific?
>
> > > >> > > > As far as I’ve found out…reviewing human thought over the ages,…
> > > >> > > > secular and religious views often are at the very least
> > intertwined.
>
> > > >> > > > On the other hand, perhaps you are being much more literal when
> > you
> > > >> > > > use the notion of “…mode of understanding things…”. If this is
> > the
> > > >> > > > case, a more specific unpacking of what the two apparently (to
> > you)
> > > >> > > > different modes would be of value, OK?
>
> > > >> > > > I’ll suspend judgment until I hear more.
>
> > > >> > > > On Mar 7, 3:01 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > i guess ..i meant a secular rather than a religious or
> > theological
> > > >> mode
> > > >> > > > of
> > > >> > > > > understanding things...the world....
>
> > > >> > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:21 PM, ornamentalmind
> > > >> > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > >> > > > > > “…revolution in knowledge and philosophy…” – PSK ???
>
> > > >> > > > > > To continue the discussion, one would need to know what you
> > mean
> > > >> here.
> > > >> > > > > > Would you unpack it a bit?
>
> > > >> > > > > > Before actually knowing what you mean, I see little if any
> > > >> > > > > > ‘revolution’ in this context. Yes, there is a process of
> > change
> > > >> in
> > > >> > > > > > thought over the millennia yet such general ‘change’ doesn’t
> > > >> mean a
> > > >> > > > > > progression towards a more accurate view. Case in point –
> > you
> > > >> are
> > > >> > > > > > apparently using the dialectical view of one view being in
> > > >> > > > > > contradiction with another. While many do apprehend in this
> > way,
> > > >> in no
> > > >> > > > > > way is that an indicator of the accuracy of such a view.
>
> > > >> > > > > > As best as I can see, both can be known consubstantially.
>
> > > >> > > > > > On Mar 7, 2:25 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > I was thinking .... i agree with what yuo guys say
> > ....could
> > > >> it also
> > > >> > > > be
> > > >> > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > revolution in knowledge and philosophy...when it was
> > > >> > > > questioned....what
> > > >> > > > > > > can an INdividual know.....it kind of pitts one against
> > the
> > > >> whole in
> > > >> > > > this
> > > >> > > > > > > struggle to know...or salvation through knowledge...what
> > > >> say....
>
> > > >> > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:01 PM, pol.science kid <
> > > >> > > > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > True we have come a long way..and the word has been
> > taken
> > > >> for
> > > >> > > > > > > > granted....but i would like an opinion of each one of
> > you
> > > >> ...on the
> > > >> > > > > > > > Sanctity of Freedom.... it is also my casual inference
> > > >> > > > > > > > that....individuality ...the  modern obsession with
> > > >> it....how come
> > > >> > > > > > > > some primitive tribes...hold the community at a level
> > above
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > > > > > individual....while it is not quite so in our
> > > >> 'modernised'...or
> > > >> > > > rather
> > > >> > > > > > > > westernised world.....are there concepts of radicalised
> > > >> > > > individuality
> > > >> > > > > > > > in the oriental philosophy..... need your opoinions
> > fellows
>
> > > >> > > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > > \--/ Peace
>
> > > >> > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > \--/ Peace
>
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > --
> > > > \--/ Peace
>
> > > --
> > >  (
> > >   )
> > > I_D Allan
>
> > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
> > > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
>  (
>   )
> I_D Allan
>
> If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
> Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to