It looks like the unions are entering into the fray. No doubt this
will accelerate the attacks on them… such as the proposals to greatly
limit and/or not allow political contributions. Perhaps if they
incorporated….

http://www.democracynow.org/2011/10/5/as_unions_students_join_occupy_wall


On Oct 5, 8:02 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> And thus the need for education. CDO Swaps and other bits of banking
> nastiness that prune money from the system while contributing nothing to it
> are part of the problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:35 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We have Occupy here too - a few tent cities so far - people also
> > making the point they ain't left-wing loonies.  I went to the
> > Manchester one yesterday to ask a few people 'why'?  I'm not sure
> > heard much that was accurate.  Might have a look at Greece nearer
> > Xmas.  Most peopleI met yesterday didn't know what collateral-
> > derivative fractional banking was.
>
> > On Oct 4, 2:40 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Well then, reckon we should all grab shovels, yes?
> > > On Oct 4, 2011 9:03 AM, "archytas" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I guess my picture of normal, Chris, would be of an ostrich with its
> > > > head in the sand - these being the people not doing occupation.
>
> > > > On Oct 4, 8:41 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> It is good to see you again Chris and Don..
>
> > > >> I was thinking (I know a rare event) last night only to have the topic
> > > >> return this morning..
>
> > > >> After watching all the demonstrations some thing emerged that does not
> > > make
> > > >> sense to me nor do I understand. maybe some one can straighten me
> > out..
>
> > > >> He goes:  If I invest my money in a company say Sky Cat (I like the
> > idea)
> > >  I
> > > >> am hoping the company will go on to produce me a profit by
> > manufacturing
> > > the
> > > >> air type craft.  They have my money, I have a share of their company
> > > >>  because they control my money..
>
> > > >> Now if I give a "Bank" control of my money they do not in return give
> > me
> > > a
> > > >> share of their stock like a normal company does..  they invest both
> > their
> > > >> money and my money and I have no problem with that,,  what I have a
> > > problem
> > > >> with is the sharing of the profits.. if there is a profit their share
> > of
> > > the
> > > >> money makes more money than mine,,  but if they lose money   It is my
> > > money
> > > >> that is lost not theirs..
>
> > > >> Even if I put money in a simple savings account,,  it is investing in
> > the
> > > >> bank..  and what I am seeing is a group if people who think the laws
> > of
> > > >> economics and moral responsibility. If they lose money,, because they
> > are
> > > >> the ones in control morally they should be taking the greater share of
> > > the
> > > >> lose..  and that includes the stock market..
> > > >> Allan
>
> > > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Chris Jenkins <
> > [email protected]
> > > >wrote:
>
> > > >> > Leaving moderation behind has made it feel like a whole new list for
> > > me. :D
>
> > > >> > I too am worried about undue influence coopting the cause, but I
> > think
> > > >> > that's an inevitability of any populist movement. Even the Egyptians
> > > are
> > > >> > warily eyeing their "liberated" government. I just hope some good is
> > > >> > accomplished along the way.
> > > >> > On Oct 3, 2011 7:15 PM, "Don Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > I'm very glad to see your august presence back amongst these
> > humble
> > > >> > boards
> > > >> > > Chris.
>
> > > >> > > The self portraits of 99%s with notes describing themselves
> > affected
> > > me
> > > >> > > somewhat. Some are easy to dismiss as whiny but many are obviously
> > > >> > feeling
> > > >> > > the same pain I see in family and friends around me. It literally
> > > puts a
> > > >> > > face, many faces actually, on our problems. I'm very glad folks
> > like
> > > you
> > > >> > are
> > > >> > > out there recording these times. I mean that because I see in you
> > > someone
> > > >> > > without a particular agenda other then improvement. I have never
> > seen
> > > you
> > > >> > as
> > > >> > > someone that ignores or tries to cover up obvious discrepancies in
> > > what
> > > >> > > politicians say and what they do. I find your support of Ron Paul
> > > >> > > refreshing. While I disagree with many of his policies the thing I
> > > most
> > > >> > > admire about him is his consistency. There are few things our
> > > President
> > > >> > has
> > > >> > > done I approve of but killing terrorists is at the top of the
> > list.
> > > Ron
> > > >> > is
> > > >> > > wrong on this.
>
> > > >> > > Now, with the ass kissing portion of my post out of the way, let's
> > > get to
> > > >> > > the Occupy(pickyourplace) kerfuffle. I made the observation in a
> > post
> > > on
> > > >> > G+
> > > >> > > that this may be one of those times when you see Tea Partiers
> > > marching
> > > >> > next
> > > >> > > to Code Pinkers. Nobody likes corp. welfare and high unemployment
> > > except
> > > >> > for
> > > >> > > the lobbyists and politicians that engineer it. Even they don't
> > like
> > > it
> > > >> > when
> > > >> > > they get caught. On the one hand I'm glad folks are "doing
> > something"
> > > but
> > > >> > on
> > > >> > > the other I'm concerned with what seems to be unions trying to
> > > highjack
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > movement for their own selfish ends. They are some of the biggest
> > > causes
> > > >> > of
> > > >> > > our current crisis. Just read s story how GM has thousands of
> > Volts
> > > >> > sitting
> > > >> > > around not getting sold. This is what happens when government
> > builds
> > > your
> > > >> > > cars or your solar panels. Somebody else always makes them better
> > AND
> > > >> > > cheaper. My concern is most of those 'protesting' don't see things
> > > quite
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > same way I do. Far too many are on the Class Warfare path and this
> > > >> > disturbs
> > > >> > > me. I have no beef with the rich. In fact, I appreciate that they
> > pay
> > > the
> > > >> > > most and give the most. I hate favoritism and that is what
> > government
> > > >> > > control and the punish/reward aspect of taxation is all about. I
> > hate
> > > it.
> > > >> > > It's why I like Herman Cain's 'plan' of 9-9-9 better then anything
> > > else
> > > >> > > anybody has come up with. Getting rid of ALL the loopholes for the
> > > very
> > > >> > > wealthy would be awesome. It's galling to find out some of the
> > most
> > > >> > ardent
> > > >> > > celebrity liberal supporters have much of their wealth sheltered
> > from
> > > >> > taxes.
> > > >> > > Smart but hugely hypocritical. That said the rich aren't the
> > problem,
> > > our
> > > >> > > screwy tax laws and a political class bent on pork and back
> > > scratching
> > > >> > and
> > > >> > > huge, mind numbing waste are. I agree we need to clean house in
> > > >> > Washington
> > > >> > > but I fear most of those in the streets would disagree with me who
> > > the
> > > >> > major
> > > >> > > culprits are.
>
> > > >> > > As usual, Rigs makes the most sense of all the comments here.
> > While
> > > I'm
> > > >> > not
> > > >> > > a supporter of the status quo exactly I do have a substantial
> > amount
> > > of
> > > >> > my
> > > >> > > retirement in the market and T-bills. The required destruction of
> > our
> > > >> > > current system to come up with something more to Archy's taste I'm
> > > scared
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > death of. That's what crazy people like George Soros want. That's
> > not
> > > for
> > > >> > > me. A more vigilant FTC and massive simplification of the tax code
> > I
> > > >> > would
> > > >> > > welcome.
>
> > > >> > > Thems my thoughts but I'm keeping an open mind.
>
> > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:42 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >> > >> Ok, let's settle for rule #10! :)
>
> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Chris Jenkins <
> > > >> > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > >> > >>> Fantastic link, Gabby! I especially like number 10. :D
>
> > > >> > >>> No, by normalcy, I meant that the media focus to date has been
> > on
> > > the
> > > >> > >>> counterculture types mostly, while ignoring those in business
> > > casual
> > > >> > attire.
> > > >> > >>> It makes it easy for the audience at large to be separate from
> > > them. I
> > > >> > want
> > > >> > >>> to show the world how many of their PEERS are there, coworkers,
> > > >> > colleagues,
> > > >> > >>> classmates...I want them to see that this isn't just some angry
> > > washed
> > > >> > out
> > > >> > >>> hippies, but an actual populist uprising comprised of their
> > friends
> > > and
> > > >> > >>> neighbors.
>
> > > >> > >>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:57 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]
>
> > > >> > wrote:
>
> > > >> > >>>> Ah, Chris, let me make clear that we understand that the
> > "normal"
> > > >> > >>>> American media is employing this technique of "creating a sense
> > of
> > > >> > >>>> connection" which worries us here across the pond. We therefore
> > > >> > >>>> welcome independent views in the U.S. What you'd call "left" is
> > > still
> > > >> > very
> > > >> > >>>> much "right" for our senses. What you call normalcy is what we
> > > often
> > > >> > >>>> perceive as extremely ignorant.
>
> > > >> > >>>> Let me give you an example of how we believe you need to take
> > > photos
> > > >> > that
> > > >> > >>>> deserve the label "independent":
> > > >> > >>>>http://www.lomography.com/about/the-ten-golden-rules
>
> > > >> > >>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Chris Jenkins <
> > > >> > >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> > >>>>> Danke, Gabby! There's a general sense of marginalization about
> > > the
> > > >> > >>>>> group, and I'm hoping to capture the normalcy of the
> > > >> > protesters...create a
> > > >> > >>>>> sense of connection.
> > > >> > >>>>> On Oct 3, 2011 11:50 AM, "gabbydott" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > >>>>> > Cheers, Chris! Documenting and sharing what you see as
> > > happening is
> > > >> > a
> > > >> > >>>>> good
> > > >> > >>>>> > thing, I find.
>
> > > >> > >>>>> > It is very much of THE thing to do today, to gather with
> > people
> > > who
> > > >> > >>>>> share
> > > >> > >>>>> > one's own view to demonstrate one's enlarged physical mass.
> > I
> > > don't
> > > >> > >>>>> think
> > > >> > >>>>> > that it is smarter than finding new ways of fair
> > communication
> > > >> > >>>>> beforehand,
> > > >> > >>>>> > though.
>
> > > >> > >>>>> > But hey, we've had our share of "we are the people" pictures
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Reply via email to