Oh, hi Molly! Yes, it's true, I dared to read the bible on the same
level as fairy tales. My Protestant nature, I guess. Going out,
looking out, speaking out is part of that tradition too. What is it in
your life that makes you being different?

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looking for God outside oneself can lead to magical gang gods at a level
> where only the fit and corrupt survive.  Many fairy tales are imbued with
> mystical thinking, including the bible.
>
>
> On Monday, October 29, 2012 5:20:17 AM UTC-4, gabbydott wrote:
>>
>> I don't know why these far-away and up-above gods and godesses never
>> really made it into my heart. Maybe the down-to-earth fairy tales
>> resembled my surroundings much more. It gives me the creeps when
>> little street gangstas are referring to Nemesis and believe they have
>> got the key to the kingdom now.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:35 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I pray to a God everyday but am not sure which one. He is male and
>> > seems helpful. Today he bolstered my strength rearranging some
>> > furniture then rebolstered me moving stuff back as it was. However, I
>> > cooked a hearty meal of steak, potatoes and asparagus for insurance.//
>> > I think the Greek and Roman gods and goddesses represent human nature
>> > and traits- really provide some valuable insights for mere mortals.
>> >
>> > On Oct 28, 12:45 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Ah Lee, by that time you would have forgotten where you were coming
>> >> from!
>> >>
>> >> I like monotheism, because it supports my view of myself as an
>> >> individual. And it allows me to act upon it as such. I am aware that I
>> >> am a social being though. Polytheism would be able to account for
>> >> that, but would probably only confuse me.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Lee Douglas <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Well that is true Rigsy, and perhaps your prediction is also true.
>> >> > However
>> >> > religious faith is 'unreasonable' belief.  As it is my stance that we
>> >> > all
>> >> > hold to some of these along the way, then perhaps it is a wholly
>> >> > human/sentient being trait and we'll not be rid of it, only time will
>> >> > tell.
>> >> > Just one of the reasons I want to reach at least 400 years old.
>> >>
>> >> > On Sunday, October 28, 2012 12:52:50 PM UTC, rigsy03 wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> Really? What about the Italian scientists who face prison time for
>> >> >> failing to predict the severity of an earthquake? What harmony under
>> >> >> the mantle of monotheism? Science and technology will make god(s)
>> >> >> obsolete and society can still be managed through various value
>> >> >> systems based on new realities and methods of control. Presently, we
>> >> >> are trying to integrate two oppositional positions which accounts
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> a good amount of absurdity and disappointment. As extinct creatures
>> >> >> might have warned us, sentimentality is deadly.
>> >>
>> >> >> On Oct 28, 2:12 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> > I really do not see much beyond monotheism  atheism holds little
>> >> >> > but
>> >> >> > wishful madness, and as for polytheism the universes would be
>> >> >> > totally
>> >> >> > different..   Just doesn't work.. You are right arrogance is a
>> >> >> > tremendous problem which I seriously doubt man will over come..
>> >> >> > those
>> >> >> > that are arrogant have little reason to change.. It is the
>> >> >> > monotheism
>> >> >> > that keeps some what harmony,,  the problems I see come from man
>> >> >> > changing the laws of God that have been handed down through the
>> >> >> > generations ..  It seems these changes are really designed to
>> >> >> > benefit
>> >> >> > them and their goals.
>> >>
>> >> >> > without a singular God there would be no harmony even with in
>> >> >> > nature
>> >> >> > and the predictability of science would disappear.
>> >> >> > Allan
>> >>
>> >> >> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:12 AM, James <[email protected]>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> > > I agree with S. W. Hawking where this is unknown territory, we
>> >> >> > > have a
>> >> >> > > tendency to being destructive and careless. We must evolve if we
>> >> >> > > wish
>> >> >> > > to
>> >> >> > > survive, boldly while trying to work out that Achilles heel
>> >> >> > > (arrogance).
>> >>
>> >> >> > > Allan I was thinking similarly in part, I am not so sure
>> >> >> > > monotheism is
>> >> >> > > for
>> >> >> > > everyone though. Where people can devise stories to fit a niche
>> >> >> > > in
>> >> >> > > nature,
>> >> >> > > then further reconcile from that I think there is much less to
>> >> >> > > say on
>> >> >> > > God
>> >> >> > > than people might, it may even be sacrilege to do so. In the
>> >> >> > > sense of
>> >> >> > > attempting authority on the nameless, a belligerent act so to
>> >> >> > > speak.
>> >> >> > > Agrarian civilization, centralization of authority, and cultural
>> >> >> > > homogeneity
>> >> >> > > (dare add monotheism) have allowed us to achieve major
>> >> >> > > advancements
>> >> >> > > but I
>> >> >> > > question that we are approaching or even on track with a
>> >> >> > > 'destination
>> >> >> > > truth'. It seems we are a hollow shell filled with culture, but
>> >> >> > > shouldn't it
>> >> >> > > be the other way around?!
>> >>
>> >> >> > > I keep looking, but I'm just not seeing that 10% innovation in
>> >> >> > > the
>> >> >> > > population, there is some serious parasitic drag somewhere in
>> >> >> > > our
>> >> >> > > equations.
>> >> >> > > Sorry so subjective tonight Al. :)
>> >>
>> >> >> > > On 10/26/2012 1:12 PM, Allan H wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> > >> The foundations of most of the religions are not that far
>> >> >> > >> apart..  it
>> >> >> > >> is
>> >> >> > >> the interpretation of them that gets the idea screwed up..  It
>> >> >> > >> seems
>> >> >> > >> though that the creator places people that have a better link
>> >> >> > >> and can
>> >> >> > >> help straighten the cultures  so there is hope as to maintain
>> >> >> > >> the
>> >> >> > >> same
>> >> >> > >> ideas.  so I think that there us a very real possibility that
>> >> >> > >> common
>> >> >> > >> ground is available.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >> poking a nd prodding out of curiosity is to be expected  it is
>> >> >> > >> called
>> >> >> > >> curiosity.
>> >> >> > >> Allan
>> >>
>> >> >> > >> Matrix  **  th3 beginning light
>> >>
>> >> >> > >> On Oct 26, 2012 3:18 PM, "Lee Douglas" <[email protected]
>> >> >> > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     Ohhh I don't know Andrew.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     As I have said we can of course speculate on all sorts of
>> >> >> > >> things
>> >> >> > >>     about alien life, but seeing as we can only ever think
>> >> >> > >> about from
>> >> >> > >>     our particular species POV, I question how useful such
>> >> >> > >> speculation
>> >> >> > >>     would be.  I think the most logical deduction we could make
>> >> >> > >> is to
>> >> >> > >>     say 'Well I really don't know', and that is indeed my line.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     Heh of course having said that and in the spirit of pure
>> >> >> > >>     speculation, given that our current understanding of
>> >> >> > >> universal
>> >> >> > >>     principles, and laws of physics etc.. seem to encompass the
>> >> >> > >> totality
>> >> >> > >>     of the universe, I do not think it incorrect to draw some
>> >> >> > >>     speculative conclusions.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     Would alien lifeforms be carbon based as on our planet?  I
>> >> >> > >>     suspect probably yes, but there are reasons enough to
>> >> >> > >> suppose
>> >> >> > >>     otherwise also.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     Would then non carbon life forms form different morality
>> >> >> > >> than
>> >> >> > >> carbon
>> >> >> > >>     based life forms?  Umm well I'm going with 'I don't know'
>> >> >> > >> for
>> >> >> > >> this
>> >> >> > >>     one, as I lack an in depth understanding of neurology.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     As a theist who believes in a single creator God though I
>> >> >> > >> would
>> >> >> > >> have
>> >> >> > >>     to agree with Allan.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     A large part of my struggle is with the message of God.
>> >> >> > >> Trying
>> >> >> > >> to
>> >> >> > >>     recompense different religions with this single message is
>> >> >> > >> hard.
>> >> >> > >> I
>> >> >> > >>     try to imagine that all religions are valid and look for
>> >> >> > >>     the similarities, I rather suspect as I grow I will have to
>> >> >> > >> claim
>> >> >> > >>     that some are wholly false and man made whilst others are
>> >> >> > >>     the direct message from God albeit fucked with by mankind
>> >> >> > >> for his
>> >> >> > >>     own nefarious ends(Christianity for example).  So then the
>> >> >> > >> job
>> >> >> > >>     becomes separating the wheat from the chaff, as it were.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     How would intelligent alien life cope with God's message I
>> >> >> > >> wonder,
>> >> >> > >>     and would they be in the boat as we? Perhaps they have no
>> >> >> > >> idea of
>> >> >> > >> a
>> >> >> > >>     God at all?  Or perhaps they may be the only beings who
>> >> >> > >> hold to
>> >> >> > >> the
>> >> >> > >>     truth?  Ahhh once again, I'm forced to say I don't know.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     Let us endeavour to understand the other sentient creatures
>> >> >> > >> we
>> >> >> > >> share
>> >> >> > >>     this planet with first, then just maybe we can make better
>> >> >> > >> educated
>> >> >> > >>     guesses.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     Heh yes you can assume from that I am in favour of granting
>> >> >> > >>     personhood upon those 'higher order' animals, enshrouded in
>> >> >> > >> law.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>     On Friday, 26 October 2012 10:22:52 UTC+1, andrew vecsey
>> >> >> > >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>         I agree. Extra terrestrial visitors to earth would not
>> >> >> > >> be
>> >> >> > >>         comparable to us. They would have different values and
>> >> >> > >> morals.
>> >> >> > >>         They would find all life sacred and would respect it,
>> >> >> > >> no
>> >> >> > >> matter
>> >> >> > >>         how depraved or primitive. Perhaps they were the ones
>> >> >> > >> who
>> >> >> > >> seeded
>> >> >> > >>         earth in the first place. They would probably recognize
>> >> >> > >> our
>> >> >> > >>         weaknesses and would let us either survive to our next
>> >> >> > >> stage
>> >> >> > >> or
>> >> >> > >>         let us destroy ourselves.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>         On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 1:19:42 PM UTC+2,
>> >> >> > >> William L.
>> >> >> > >>         Houts William L. Houts Lukaeon William L. Houts wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>             All right, I just wanted to run this by you guys.
>> >> >> > >> I know
>> >> >> > >> it
>> >> >> > >>             seems I'm
>> >> >> > >>             always rattlling on about aliens, but they're
>> >> >> > >> really a
>> >> >> > >> stand
>> >> >> > >>             in for,
>> >> >> > >>             well, for a lot of things.  Anyway, I've been on
>> >> >> > >> Facebook
>> >> >> > >>             and recently
>> >> >> > >>             made a status report commenting on the conversation
>> >> >> > >> we
>> >> >> > >> had
>> >> >> > >>             going on here
>> >> >> > >>             about hypothetical aliens and what they might or
>> >> >> > >> might
>> >> >> > >> not
>> >> >> > >>             want from
>> >> >> > >>             us.  And I was making the point that I made here:
>> >> >> > >> that
>> >> >> > >> said
>> >> >> > >>             aliens will
>> >> >> > >>             turn out to be just as befuddled by it all as we
>> >> >> > >> are, and
>> >> >> > >>             are probably
>> >> >> > >>             in no position to give us the goods on life's
>> >> >> > >> mysteries,
>> >> >> > >> or
>> >> >> > >>             even make a
>> >> >> > >>             good cocktail.
>> >>
>> >> >> > >>             Now, my friend Matt, who is very smart but also
>> >> >> > >> very
>> >> >> > >> bitchy,
>> >> >> > >>             put forth
>> >> >> > >>             Professor Hawking's notion:  that we'd better keep
>> >> >> > >> our
>> >> >> > >> heads
>> >> >> > >>             down low,
>> >> >> > >>             because history tells us that when a more
>> >> >> > >> technologically
>> >> >> > >>             advanced
>> >> >> > >>             species meets a less developed one, the results are
>> >> >> > >> usually
>> >> >> > >>             horrible for
>> >> >> > >>             the latter.  I replied that yes, this does seem to
>> >> >> > >> be the
>> >> >> > >>             pattern in
>> >> >> > >>             Earth history.  But, I went on, races which manage
>> >> >> > >> to
>> >> >> > >> break
>> >> >> > >> the
>> >> >> > >>             lightspeed barrier are going to have better things
>> >> >> > >> to do
>> >> >> > >>             than enslave 7
>> >> >> > >>             billion people, or even mistreat them very much.
>> >> >> > >> Their
>> >> >> > >>             energy problems,
>> >> >> > >>             I said more or less, will have been solved to such
>> >> >> > >> an
>> >> >> > >> extent
>> >> >> > >>             that they
>> >>
>> >> ...
>> >>
>> >> read more ยป- Hide quoted text -
>> >>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
> --
>
>
>

-- 



Reply via email to