The Xtians do Xmas quite well Lee - though it is in fact the Anglo-
Saxon New Year.

On 7 Dec, 16:35, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Haha whatever gave you that impression Allan?
>
> Really though you don't think that female priests represent a change in
> theology?  I know both gay men and gay woman who are preists, this is known
> and excepted in the Anglican church.  I don't know one Christian who keeps
> the sabath, rather than do a spot of shopping, do you?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, 7 December 2012 14:01:48 UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
> > I know you dis agree .. birth control and woman bishops effectively no
> > more than administration.  How has those events changing the theology? They
> > still strickly following  the rules unchanged since early centuries
> > Allan
>
> > Matrix  **  th3 beginning light
> > On Dec 7, 2012 1:35 PM, "Lee Douglas" <[email protected] <javascript:>>
> > wrote:
>
> >> You are joking right Allan?
>
> >> The changes are only in administration?  So Catholics the world over are
> >> not using contraception in spite of what the pope says?  No such change I
> >> think is driven and will be further driven by the faiths followers more
> >> than it's leaders.  When the new Arch Bishop of Canterbury leaves his new
> >> post any changes that he has affected will still be there, one day woman
> >> Bishops will be common place, despite any changes in administration.
>
> >> Besides if you think of religous ideas in the same way as any and all
> >> other ideas, then it is clear to see that such ideas will evolve or die.
> >> We no longer belive that the Earth is the center of the universe, that
> >> right there is a dead religous idea.  Yet Catholosism is still very much
> >> with us, and that right there is an example of evolotion of the idea rather
> >> than the admisistration.
> >> On Friday, 7 December 2012 11:40:07 UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>
> >>> The changes are only in administration,, to me that is not evolutionary
> >>> type change
> >>> Allan
>
> >>> Matrix  **  th3 beginning light
> >>> On Dec 7, 2012 11:51 AM, "Lee Douglas" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>> Hahah maybey, maybe.  I am though the eternal optimist so I see things
> >>>> differantly.
>
> >>>> The Anglican church in particular are making some good moves.
>
> >>>> There are though only two things I wish to comment on at this momnet.
>
> >>>> My career in IT support thus far informs me that people do seem to have
> >>>> an inbuilt resistance to change, and ultimatly the Christian church in
> >>>> particular but of course all other dogmatic religions need to change or
> >>>> they risk dieing out.
> >>>> On Friday, 7 December 2012 10:02:37 UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>
> >>>>> From what I have seen it does evolve..  it seems mostly in the
> >>>>> negative directions..  probably because of greed and a desire to
> >>>>> control rather than spirituality..  there are exceptions but they are
> >>>>> rare.
> >>>>> Allan
>
> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Lee Douglas <[email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > And in truth Allan religion does evolove, perhaps slowly but evolove
> >>>>> it
> >>>>> > does.
>
> >>>>> > On Thursday, 6 December 2012 19:21:35 UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>
> >>>>> >> I think that religion should evolve..just like the rest of the
> >>>>> >> universe.. when the evolution stops it begins to die..  a good
> >>>>> example
> >>>>> >> of dead beliefs is those our fundamentalist friend is presenting.
> >>>>> >> Recite the magickal incantation  and and every thing will be all
> >>>>> >> right..   this statement to me is one of a dead faith'
> >>>>> >> Allan
>
> >>>>> >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:31 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > Biology is describing a 'co-evolution arms race'.  Religious
> >>>>> notions
> >>>>> >> > of the eternal have a lot in common with Popper's 'World 3' and
> >>>>> what
> >>>>> >> > we can regard as 'objective' and 'factual'  I'm as sure as you
> >>>>> about
> >>>>> >> > the 'meanness' you often describe and believe the way through it,
> >>>>> past
> >>>>> >> > it, whatever - is spiritual - maybe a kind of dawning.
>
> >>>>> >> > There's a joke in the new Batman film (other 2 hours plus
> >>>>> rubbish) -
> >>>>> >> > when the bad guys raid the stock exchange a trader says there is
> >>>>> no
> >>>>> >> > money there for them to steal - the answer is that there must be
> >>>>> -
> >>>>> >> > otherwise the traders wouldn't be there.  I think economics is
> >>>>> largely
> >>>>> >> > a fetish designed around libidinal and domination 'needs' -  but
> >>>>> even
> >>>>> >> > organised religion becomes such.  My guess is we need a spiritual
> >>>>> >> > democracy and finance is set against this forcing us into
> >>>>> compliance
> >>>>> >> > with its control fraud much as many routinely bend their knees in
> >>>>> >> > religious observance.  Science, admittedly as reliably as a
> >>>>> double-
> >>>>> >> > glazing salesman, is suggesting human-biological intelligence is
> >>>>> >> > already giving way to more machine-substrates that offer quasi-
> >>>>> >> > immortality and intellect beyond a singularity we can hardly
> >>>>> imagine.
> >>>>> >> > In my science fiction dreaming we may discover the alien life on
> >>>>> Earth
> >>>>> >> > is actually ours and we have only been used by another, more
> >>>>> worthy
> >>>>> >> > consciousness..
>
> >>>>> >> > On 6 Dec, 12:26, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> >> >> Many things are best guesses..  are the foundation to many
> >>>>> things along
> >>>>> >> >> what has been observed .. and there is nothing wrong with that
> >>>>> .. many
> >>>>> >> >> ideas have evolved from the instinct for survival .. from that
> >>>>> has come
> >>>>> >> >> selfishness which has lead to the excessive uncaring greed we
> >>>>> see
> >>>>> >> >> today...
> >>>>> >> >> sacrificing the other ant.
> >>>>> >> >> Allan
>
> >>>>> >> >> Matrix  **  th3 beginning light
> >>>>> >> >> On Dec 6, 2012 11:09 AM, "archytas" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>> >> >> > Sounds like something Pontius Pilate might have used.
>
> >>>>> >> >> > I guess that David Deutsch and constructor theory tries to get
> >>>>> back
> >>>>> >> >> > to
> >>>>> >> >> > reminding science about its root guesses Allan.  I take from
> >>>>> >> >> > 'Spartacus Ants' sacrificing themselves to destroy slaver ants
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> >> >> > pre-human biology 'knows' something of survival instinct.
>
> >>>>> >> >> > Descartes had it that until we could get to a point of
> >>>>> re-evaluating
> >>>>> >> >> > against his radical doubt one had to trust in a beneficent
> >>>>> god.
> >>>>> >> >> > Whilst we can criticize his system, I think anti-religious
> >>>>> science
> >>>>> >> >> > misses the beat on issues of how we can live until we know
> >>>>> more.  The
> >>>>> >> >> > spiritual thus has its place. There is plenty to avoid in its
> >>>>> history
> >>>>> >> >> > of control fraud, abuse, sexism and war crimes - but plenty to
> >>>>> learn
> >>>>> >> >> > in terms of grace and fellowship.
>
> >>>>> >> >> > On 6 Dec, 08:15, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> >> >> > > it is not for cleaning hands  ,,  it just gets rid of smell
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> >> >> > > you
> >>>>> >> >> > > can not get rid of no matter how much you wash..  you just
> >>>>> wash
> >>>>> >> >> > > after
> >>>>> >> >> > > youor hands are clean,,  then the smell is gone.
> >>>>> >> >> > > Allan
>
> >>>>> >> >> > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:27 PM, gabbydott <
> >>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>> >> >> > > wrote:
> >>>>> >> >> > > > Hm, I have never thought of using a steel soap bar for
> >>>>> cleaning
> >>>>> >> >> > > > my
> >>>>> >> >> > hands. I
> >>>>> >> >> > > > use it occasionally for my pots and pans. And for the more
> >>>>> >> >> > > > difficult
> >>>>> >> >> > dirt on
> >>>>> >> >> > > > my hands I use a pumice stone or lemon. And more and more
> >>>>> often I
> >>>>> >> >> > > > wear
> >>>>> >> >> > > > gloves or buy frozen and precut garlic and onion. But
> >>>>> thanks for
> >>>>> >> >> > > > the
> >>>>> >> >> > tip.
> >>>>> >> >> > > > I'm sure that one day I'll make use of it. Why not steel
> >>>>> instead
> >>>>> >> >> > > > of
> >>>>> >> >> > stone,
> >>>>> >> >> > > > you're right.
>
> >>>>> >> >> > > > On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:54:42 PM UTC+1, Allan
> >>>>> Heretic
> >>>>> >> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> Well actually Gabby  I have this stainless steel soap bar
> >>>>> used
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> for
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> getting rid of ordure off your hands   things like onion,
> >>>>> Garlic
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> ,,
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> any strong ordure ,,   just tried it on the epoxy smell
> >>>>> left
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> over from
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> fixing my maxi egg coddler.
>
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> now one of the greatest mysteries of the universe,,  how
> >>>>> does it
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> work?
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> Allan
>
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:38 PM, gabbydott <
> >>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> wrote:
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > The pointlessness of the points' business. Like Lee, I
> >>>>> find
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > the God
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > concept
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > much more to the point. :)
>
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > I don't follow Lee's sequencing model - first spirit,
> >>>>> then
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > matter -
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > though.
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > This sounds very man-made to me. ;)
>
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > As for the storytelling aspect, yes, the Chronos story
> >>>>> is much
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > more
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > vivid
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > than the "God created (x) and saw it was good" story.
> >>>>> That's
> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > true.
> >>>>> >> >> > But
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 



Reply via email to