I'm sure you're right. The generation gap is likely more language than
anything else. Words have meaning, but that meaning changes.

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:23 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:

> Word usage and meaning is not a static thing, Chris. The big boy or big
> girl pattern identifies you as not raised or reflected on ageism, sexism
> and hierarchical Macht (power, potency, force) dimensions in communication
> in general. You are fine in your local ecosystem with that.
> That's what it translates to me. I doubt your children will use it the
> old-school way you do.
>
> Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015 schrieb Chris Jenkins :
>
>> I suppose the demeaning part just doesn't translate. "You're a big boy"
>> is a pretty common phrase in use here when describing someone's competence
>> or capability, not maturity or intelligence.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Allan already admitted he was using it as a way to tell Gabby to grow
>>> up. If you call a grown woman a big girl or girl, it is demeaning because
>>> you are implying they are immature or not as intelligent. If you call a
>>> three year old a big girl, they may appreciate you noticing that they are
>>> growing up. No brainer.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 12:15:27 PM UTC-4, Chris Jenkins wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hold up, now, there has to be SOME understanding of colloquial use of
>>>> language if there's any hope to achieve common ground. "Big boy" and "Big
>>>> girl" are very much colloquial ways to describe someone who is grown up and
>>>> capable of taking care of themselves. It's not specifically gendered for
>>>> the purpose of gender, and it's not the same casual usage of "girl" which
>>>> causes offense to those sensitive to such.
>>>>
>>>> The language police have become much more aggressive, I see.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Allan, calling a woman a girl is well known to be gender insensitive.
>>>> If you don't think so, suggest you brush up or this may not be the last
>>>> time you are called out for it. If indeed we are all supportive for human
>>>> rights, we can bring ourselves to be sensitive to what the other feels when
>>>> bearing the brunt of our words. Here in the states, calling a man a boy can
>>>> get you in a great deal of trouble depending on the color of your skin and
>>>> the region that your feet are currently planted upon. Words do matter, and
>>>> claiming what is said is said in jest or is insignificant is an age old way
>>>> to discount the reality of inequity, and always shows itself to be exactly
>>>> what it is to people with attitudes that truly support human rights. So
>>>> many of our words come to us through social conditioning, we don't
>>>> understand the origin or inequity. It is incumbent on each of us to try.
>>>> Tolerance of biased or abusive attitudes creates cultures of inequity.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:59:10 AM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>>>
>>>> To me all " big girl " is saying is she is an adult and of female
>>>> gender.. nothing more.. unless may be grow up.  No different some one
>>>> telling me I am a big boy..
>>>>
>>>> But if i say the sun is shining Gabby is offended.. if she is offended
>>>> i will stop using it..
>>>>
>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Molly <[email protected]>
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 4:38 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I have to go with Gabby on this one. Calling her a big girl is
>>>> gender insensitive and demeaning.
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:27:40 AM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to find out why our big girl Gabby is so bothered be me??
>>>> Is Gabby's soul felling a bit guilty over what..that is a real question..
>>>>
>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: archytas <[email protected]>
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 4:16 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have false teeth by any chance Gabby?  If so, could you have a
>>>> second set made, then you could leave them in situ after biting his ass,
>>>> and save the rest of us from the thiedium?
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 2:05:11 PM UTC, Gabby wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Big girl - that's not my wording, not my style, not how I view myself.
>>>> It's true, I was trying to make a constructive suggestion to get us out
>>>> of your barking at us and twisting our words to draw the focus of attention
>>>> to your soul perspective. Can you think of another solution so we others do
>>>> not have to constantly feel attacked?
>>>>
>>>> Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015 schrieb :
>>>>
>>>> If you want the topic opened, open it Gabby. You keep telling me you
>>>> are a big girl..
>>>>
>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: gabbydott <[email protected]>
>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 2:34 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards.
>>>>
>>>> Soul is a place holder for "guilty conscious" in this context here, I
>>>> suppose. I suggest you open a thread with the header "soul" and you collect
>>>> all the different meanings you have identified us others associate with it.
>>>> We would also profit from it by being able to go there when in need of
>>>> translation options for your "soul" usage. And you could be sure it was
>>>> your very own translation that is being used by the others. What do you
>>>> think?
>>>>
>>>> Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015 schrieb :
>>>>
>>>> When people do wrong knowing they justify it because their soul knows
>>>> it is wrong and they should not be doing it.
>>>>
>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: RP Singh <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Minds Eye <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 8:57 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards.
>>>>
>>>> Sure Allan, but these criminals seek excuses to justify themselves to
>>>> others and themselves. As a matter of fact there is no excuse for any crime
>>>> and a criminal has to bear the consequences of his act.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:02 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There is no justification for rape in any form or of any gender.
>>>>
>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: RP Singh <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Minds Eye <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 3:36 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards.
>>>>
>>>> The women dressing sense developed in the west gradually and it was not
>>>> copying others but an indigenous matter and as it was a gradual process the
>>>> western society as a whole was able to accept it. But in India it was not
>>>> so, some educated girls started copying the west and Indian society as a
>>>> whole was not prepared for it, and that is the reason that some backward
>>>> sections of our society find it unacceptable, but still it has nothing to
>>>> do with rape, which is a criminal act and done by criminal people. The
>>>> reasons that such people give for it is just a justification for their
>>>> criminal deed and not the real reason.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 6:21 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The argument that there are rapes in India because girls are not raised
>>>> up as equals with comparison to boys is not correct. If today girls are
>>>> entering into the workforce is not as a result of girls asserting
>>>> themselves but because their families are giving them a chance to make a
>>>> career for themselves. The parents, brothers, and husbands are co-operating
>>>> with the girls, they are encouraging the girls to go out and become career
>>>> girls and this is not limited to just the urban population but also
>>>> applicable to villagers. Consider the position of women a few centuries
>>>> back in Europe and America, they were just housewives and were not
>>>> encouraged to become doctors and engineers. India was an occupied coun
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>
>>>  --
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/-5LTfst-rD0/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to