i don't know, i said it as more as a joke, your right, it is VERY expencive for a VW, and the A2 16v's are still a better car but it's the closest thing to a real performer from VW since 1992 in NA just my thoughts jeremy
[email protected] wrote: ><< nice but 30 g's US > >the audi TT version of the same engine is rated 9hp higher??, go figure!! >> > >- Hey, I love the R32, but how do you see it as a replacement for the A2 16V? > This thing's thirty thousand dollars!!! To me, it's in a different >category. It's more in the WRX category. > >Don't you think that the GTI 337 and the upcoming limited edition GTI are >better "successors" to the A2 16V? > >By the way, my friend works at the local VW/Audi research center. Currently >they have 3 R32's, 3 limited edition GTI's, and a couple of TT's with the VR6 >and dual clutch system. Yes, he gets to drive all of them. > >Alex Ranarivelo >South California >'91 GTI 16V >w/European Motorworks ported 1.8 16V head, euro intake cam, Garrett chip, >2.25 in. exhaust w/Borla, passat cat, 3.90 ring and pinion, .80 5th gear, no >A/C, neuspeed lowering springs, and rear tri-tie bar. ><A HREF="http://www.iders.com/alexweb/";>Alex's Tuning Information</A> >_______________________________________________ >a2-16v-list mailing list >[email protected] >http://mail.a2-16v.com/mailman/listinfo/a2-16v-list >For list archives, see listinfo link above. > __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
