[David M] Sure there are internal and external experiences in the sense that some stuff is public and other stuff is private. But it is all experience for MOQ, and all either SQ or DQ. The distinction private/public matches poorly to subject/object and the latter can be dropped as a metaphysical distinction between forms of experience as MOQ suggests.
[Krimel] If you were to say that all experience is private and there is no such thing as a public experience, I might agree but public/private maps precisely onto to subjective/objective. To the extent that objective or public experiences exist at all; they are the intersection or overlap of the private experience of individual subjects. They are those things upon which multiple observers can agree. Saying that this distinction can be dropped amounts to saying that all experience is private or subjective. But are you actually saying that? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
