Ron comments below:
> > Ron:
> > Perhaps intellectual is the individual
> manifestation of culture
> > Or culture of the individual.
>
> That's why I proposed to rename the intellectual
> level the individual
> level.
> The rights Pisig mentioned as being the province of
> intellect all apply
> to
> individuals -- right of free speech, trial by jury,
> etc.
>
> Platt,
>
> Sure seems to work when defined in this manner
> doesn't it?
> I'm going to need a little time to see if it holds
> water
> But I think we're pointed in the right direction.
> At the very least we are zeroing in on a better
> Understanding on what the term intellectual means
> In relation to the MoQ.
Some of us have been down this path with Platt on
his naming of the intellectual level as the individual
level. I found it difficult due to the exclusion of
the individual on the intellectual level. I find the
individual to be composed of [or a dependent
origination (in other words, the individuals' origin
depends upon] intellectual patterns, social patterns,
organic patterns, inorganic patterns and dynamic
quality.
light bulb shines through the woods into the window,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
