[Peter]
> I listened to a tape of 'The Language Instinct' by Steven Pinker  
> the other day. One section brought home to me that subject/object logic is

> the basis of the intellect.  Pinker shows how a dumb machine can perform 
> logical deductions; that given two sentences: 'Socrates is a man' and 'All

> men are mortal' a mechanical apparatus can move the words around to 
> produce: 'Therefore Socrates is mortal'. That apparatus can always make 
> correct logical deductions given two sentences in the appropriate form.

[Krimel]
Elizajou was an early attempt at a program that could simulate human
conversational interaction. Part Rogerian therapist and part Turing test
poser it was a nice effort but easy to see through. Kurzweil believes
machines will pass the Turing test within 25 to 50 years. The chief argument
against machines being humanlike in the face of this, would be that they do
not have human emotional responses. Since emotional responses are the
products of evolution on a vast time scale and are functions that preserve
the lives of organic beings it is questionable how valuable they might be to
a machine intelligence.

Steve:
I don't see how this is an example that all intellect is subject  
object thinking. Where are the subjects and objects in this? I see  
this as an example that shows that not all thinking is S/O based.  
Artificial intelligence is a Platypus in SOM because we have an  
object (the computer) thinking while in SOM only subjects think. The  
MOQ can resolve this problem...

[Krimel]
I would suggest this is in part a product of the fact that we have no
agreement on what constitutes intellect. To the extent that it is symbol
manipulation then machines already have it. To the extent that it is stored
'knowledge', they have that as well. But as far as it being a platypus
because an object is thinking; you are an object and you can think, right?

[Steve]
In SOM I think objects are physical substances while subjects are  
mental substances.

[Krimel]
Mental Substance? 
Is that an oxymoron? 
How much "mental substance" will fit in a shot glass? 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to