Steve, I'm not going to add another word. It's a bit unfair because I'm flying on instinctual agreement with what I think I see Tittivulus getting at. This is not clearly worked out in my head, but my first attempt to play with it. Although, I do like what's happening.
So, sorry I interrupted. Marsha At 02:35 PM 12/21/2007, you wrote: >At 01:54 PM 12/21/2007, you wrote: > > Hi Marsha, > > > > >Seems to me a view is a static pattern of value. Why couldn't a > > >pattern exist in both the social level and intellectual level? One > > >based on belief and habit (social), the other based on a patterns > > >within science and a patterns within philosophy (intellectual). > > > >Steve: > >I think social patterns are the hardest thing to understand about > >the MOQ. As I see it, beliefs are intellectual. Habits to the extent > >they refer to habits of mind like dividing experience into > >categories of subjects and objects are patterns of thought and are > >intellectual as well. > >Steve, > >Doesn't the s/o experience having overlapping social patterns >(component experiences) and intellectual patterns (component >experience) help? At the Social Level we don't think this is >subject, this is object. It's the social aspect of Mind, but we >don't think it in a manipulating (Intellectual) way, we just take it >for granted. > >Marsha > > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
