Interesting Ron, Arlo, This is leading us to the "immediate participation before (typically objective)intellectualization" story (if we weren't already there), but Ron,
Why do you say it [the immediate response to Quality] "makes the MoQ questionable as to being axiomatic this way" ? Could you elaborate / explain that point ? Are you suggesting it is even more fundamental in some way than simply axiomatic of the MoQ ? (and hence the misundersanding with Bo in another thread) Ian Ron: It's kinda a circular logic thing Ian, that's why I say It is questionable, but because the response to Quality Or the quality event or even the simple term Quality itself Means this experience of being alive, is the fundamental Shall we say, aspect? Idea? See, even the words I use imply An intellectual quality to a pre-existent phenomena that Already exists. I think in this way the "proof" of MoQ is experience itself. We do not have to assume it for we ARE it. Hope you get my meaning. This is a good topic. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
