Krim, absolutely no such suggestion in what I said ... on the contrary it's our most enlightened expreince.
ie I would agree with you ... it's possibly the most important part of all our experiece (always) ... my point is we keep tying each other in knots trying to define it .... intellectually ... ie and that's a bad thing, a waste of intellect. Ian On 5/28/08, Krimel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Ian] > DM, Ron, DMB et al .. > > DM, I think this post and your later one are simply leading us to > accept that yes, there is some pre-linguitsic, primary, immediate > experience. Our "consciousness" of that is some kind of > "pre-linguistic / pre-intellectual thought". > > [et al...] > Why do we all keep talking about pre-linguistic as though it were some kind > of infant experience waiting to "grow-up"? Why not admit that most of our > experience is non-linguistic and that most of our time is spent in states of > non-consciousness. We only think we are conscious because when we think > about what we are thinking about, we construct a conscious self out of thin > air or rather out of remembered experience. Most of the time it just ain't > there at all. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
