Quoting ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Platt] > Of course, you're knowledgeable> What a laugh. > > [Arlo] > About "postmodernism"? You betcha. Albeit there are many more knowledgeable > than I. You, however, demonstrate nothing but willful ignorance on the topic, > proven by your own words.
With all the information on th web about postmodernism it's hard to be willfully ignorant of the subject. Since as usual you make the assertion without evidence, I'll chalk it up to ignorance. > [Platt] > Do you also disagree with following? > > [Arlo] > With Pirsig's own qualification, "given a value-centered Metaphysics of > Quality", yes. But the MOQ is simply the best we have now, I do not consider > it > to be Absolute Truth for All Time, and I doubt Pirsig would either. Its always > "one person talking at one point in time". > > [Platt] > Isn't there a great deal of preparation required to stand on hot burning coals > without getting burned? > > [Arlo] > Maybe, so what? The point is that the same experience you find "low quality" > may be considered "high quality" by another. No difference between a planned performance and an accident? Surely you jest. > [Platt] > Do you mean for all people for all time? > > [Arlo] > I mean biologically the human body responds more-or-less similarly to > inorganic > stimuli. But there are still variations. There are documented cases of people > who have no "hunger" sense, they would unknowingly starve to death if no one > else intervened. Is anything certain to you, or is "Nothing is certain" another self-contradictory postmodern tenant? > [Platt] > He was probably drugged out of his mind. > > [Arlo] > Proof? Proof he wasn't? ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
