You are still perhaps missing my point Craig. The fact that the gap in definition is unclosable is a GOOD THING. It is counterproductive trying to close it. It's not a mater of relative priorities.
Once we've pointed out that SOMist gap between a metaphysics and the world it describes, we have finished the exercise. People who think that gap is a problem to be worked on by better definiting more things, have missed the quality of the conclusion. The gap means SOMism fails, when it comes to metaphysics. Ian On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:16 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Words, words, words...I'm so sick of words. I get words all > day through, first from him, now from you. Is that all you > blighters can do?" > (Liza Doolittle, "My Fair Lady") > > ian, > I agree with your larger point, that it is more important to > "walk the walk", than to "talk the talk". > However, if we are going to talk, I think it is important to > distinguish Quality from its metaphysics & also > definition/analysis from description. > Craig > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
