Craig you said > Steve is talking about "an intellectual description of Quality". > Ian is talking about an "intellectual description of the MoQ". > So the two are talking about different things.
I say ... quite possibly in the specific statements, I actually listed a number of things (MoQ, DQ, Q, reality) but it doesn't change my point. Their SOMist intellectual description is not them ... which was the recurring finger-moon / map-terrain / menu-meal point. SOMist intellectualization (of reality) will never close that gap (it just leads to more Platypi), only MoQish participation (in life) closes that gap. I'm saying that's a good thing: We know that more and more definition of what MoQ or Q are (as the subjects and objects of our sentences) is energy wasted, once one has accepted it is energy wasted, so let's use it more productively ... in rhetoric, poetry and living. Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
