Make no mistake, religeon and science are competing forms of intellectual patterns. The struggle is between older static patterns and newer more dynamic patterns.
Now if you want to say that the more dynamic intellectual patterns are the ones that are moraly superior to those intellectual patterns which are more static, then you have a more reliable assessment of the situation. -ron ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I challenged you to have a look at this LILA quote "But what the larger intellectual structure of the Metaphysics of Quality makes clear is that this political battle of science to free itself from domination by social moral codes was in fact a moral battle! It was the battle of a higher, intellectual level of evolution to keep itself from being devoured by a lower, social level of evolution." (Lila, 24) Science is SOM, that much we agree on? And if science tries to free itself from social (level) domination it must be intellect's foremost value. In fact Pirsig just says it here, it's intellect's cause. If this isn't SOL what is? Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
