> Therefore, Platt, If I may be so bold as to suggest re-focusing your > bias > in such a manner as to look at those cultures which value intellectual > dynamism as having morally superiority over those that do not.
Exactly so. I assume your bias is also thus focused?. Platt > ________________________________ > From: X Acto <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2009 9:07:40 AM > Subject: Re: [MD] Multiculturalism scam > > > > Make no mistake, religeon and science are > competing forms of intellectual patterns. > The struggle is between older static patterns > and newer more dynamic patterns. > > Now if you want to say that the more dynamic > intellectual patterns are the ones that are moraly > superior to those intellectual patterns which are > more static, then you have a more reliable > assessment of the situation. > -ron > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------------------------------------------- > > I challenged you to have a look at this LILA quote > > "But what the larger intellectual structure of the Metaphysics of > Quality makes clear is that this political battle of science to free > itself from domination by social moral codes was in fact a > moral battle! It was the battle of a higher, intellectual level of > evolution to keep itself from being devoured by a lower, social > level of evolution." (Lila, 24) > > Science is SOM, that much we agree on? And if science tries to free > itself from social (level) domination it must be intellect's foremost > value. In fact Pirsig just says it here, it's intellect's cause. If this > isn't > SOL what is? > > Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
