dmb says to Andre: Yes, static quality is patterned and Dynamic Quality is not patterned. But this doesn't mean that concepts (SPOV) are unreal. In the art gallery analogy, where we can look at a variety of sets of static patterns, all the paintings are equally real. If you were to pick one and say that it's the real one while the others aren't, that would be an illusion. It's illusory in the sense that you'd be taking derived concepts as more real than the reality from which they were derived. I suppose your question arises from something like that.
Andre: Bear with me please dmb, I am trodding ground I am not used to trodding: So the MoQ as a 'derived conceptual framework' is not different from the reality (DQ/SQ) it describes? If you agree with this, then what is language as a pattern of value (both spoken and written)? Does it exist in an 'objective/subjective' sense (as SOM would have it) or does the MoQ challenge this? If so,in what way? Is this a ligitimate line of questioning or not (in the sense that; "Am I going wacko now?") Am very interested to hear your (and anyone's) views on this. Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
