> > Arlo asks: > > YOU denigrate "chance" saying "it's not chance, it's DQ". YOU provide me > > ONE distinction, JUST ONE between the two.
MP: Platt is on his own, but as I see it ... - Chance is quantifiable. One can use mathematics to estimate or roughly predict the results of chance. You can't do that with Quality; Quality and its direct results are only qualifiable. - Chance is a measure (of the lack of something, eg: order,) Quality is immeasurable. If you can measure something that comes as a result of Quality, you must be measuring something else upon/in/through/by which Quality was manifest through experience. - Chance is only found in results, Quality precedes results. Or do I mis-understand Quality? MP ---- "Don't believe everything you think." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
