Arlo to Andre: Look at the soul searching inside the NASA organisation after the disaster with the Challenger. This has nothing to do with DQ it had everything to do with shutting out DQ... [Arlo] I'd say that the steel and fuel molecules and inorganic components of the shuttle and rocket responded to DQ (from their inorganic repertoire of probability) every step of the way. The rocket did not crash because of a neglect of DQ, it failed because the inorganic components of the rocket were allowed to MUCH response to DQ. The intellectual (and social, and biological) components of this flight depended precisely on ensuring that the inorganic components of the rocket had NO room to behave any differently than planned.
Andre: And they did, and hopefully, the intellectual patterns investigating this tragedy have learnt some more about the behaviour of organic/inorganic PoV's (in the said circumstances/context) to minimise the chances of a repeat. Arlo: When that failed, and the atoms and whatnot composing the rocket were "freed" from their prison, they responded to DQ in a way that caused a conflict between them and the intellectual-social-biological components, and the inorganic components won. Anyway, that's my take on it. Andre: I agree with you Arlo, and as said above, hopefully we have learned some more from this and other tragedies. As you are no doubt aware, we have had one a few weeks ago here in Amsterdam with Turkish Airlines. Preliminary investigation points to mechanical and human 'faillure'. These indications simply point to the ever present need to remain dynamically active in our search for improvements,... realising these will be provisional. Regards, Andre PS did you enjoy that ride on the Harley? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
