MP: Platt is on his own, but as I see it ... - Chance is quantifiable. One can use mathematics to estimate or roughly predict the results of chance. You can't do that with Quality; Quality and its direct results are only qualifiable.
- Chance is a measure (of the lack of something, eg: order,) Quality is immeasurable. If you can measure something that comes as a result of Quality, you must be measuring something else upon/in/through/by which Quality was manifest through experience. - Chance is only found in results, Quality precedes results. Or do I mis-understand Quality? [Krimel] Probability is a way of quantifying chance. You can measure Quality in terms of the odds in your favor; what seems GOOD to you and its likelihood of becoming. Results are no longer subject to chance. They are chances resolved into stasis. Chance and Quality are estimates of future possibility based on every instant's resolution of the uncertainty that gave rise to it. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
