Marsha to Andre:
Oh yes, of course, you were being very serious.  I don't want anyone
to suffer.  Sorry.  - Marsha

Andre:
Maybe I am too serious sometimes Marsha...I glance at your conversation with
Ham... why should I be serious about concepts? If, since, in the run of this
Discuss there appears to be a consensus on the notion that we are all
intellectual constructs...thus ideas in each and everyone's 'mind' and
therefore mere conceptualisations...why should I really bother?
Why should I concern myself with SPOV's when they are ONLY intellectuallised
constructs? A 'useful' way of conceptualising... .
Ha, if I do not like the construct well, I'll just 'change my mind' and make
the world, and my own conceptualised patterns of it and in it, more amenable
to whatever?
Is this, philosophical idealism, the MoQ?

I think, Mr.Pirsig has presented us with an experience called the MoQ which
has taken us as close to reality as no one has ever done in the history of
Western thought: DQ/SQ.

We are not half aware of the implications/possibilities this is handing out
to us. We need to radically reinvestigate our SOM interpretations of
'intellect' and 'intellectualising'.

Is the MoQ just another interesting philosophical painting hanging in our
intellectual gallery?

I am no expert, no philosopher, mathematician or logician. But as DQ/SQ I do
know what I see, hear, feel, taste, smell , intuit, imagine. and experience.

Any thoughts Marsha?

Kind regards
Andre
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to