http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-Plain-Simple-Steve-Hagen/dp/0767903323/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1238358043&sr=1-1





At 03:54 PM 3/29/2009, you wrote:
On Saturday 28 March 2009 9:04 PM Markhsmit writes to Joe:

Hi Joe,
>
> I'm still having difficulty understanding the evolution of Quality.
> This  would imply to me that new Quality is being formed, Quality
> that did not exist before.  Has Quality evolved in the last 5000
> years?  I am seriously asking this because it does not fit with my
> current understanding, which may be erroneously Eastern (like the
> Tao) at this point..  I am rereading Lila which may help me out.  My
> conception of harmony is the temporary coalescence of Quality.  This
> coalescence and dissipation is ongoing, an ebb and flow kind of
> thing, rather than growth.
>
> Thanks,

Hi Markhsmit, and All,

I will ask you a question.  What tool are you using to try to understand the
evolution of quality?  SOM posits a distinction between body and mind,
between real existence and intentional existence.  Evolution of quality is
not understandable using a metaphysics based on a mind/body division.

MOQ proposes an evolutionary law of order.  Each manifestation in evolution
combines DQundefined/SQdefined. The existence of the evolutionary order is
real, not the supposed intentional existence created by a mind to give
reality to an idea of order.  An inorganic rock exists in a different
evolutionary order from an organic flower.  Time is not creative in
cataloguing change, e,g, give it time.  Space does not create dimensions.

These are my thoughts as I discuss a metaphysics of quality, MOQ.

Joe

On 3/28/09 9:04 PM, "markhsmit" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Joe,
>
> I'm still having difficulty understanding the evolution of Quality.  This
> would imply to me that new Quality is being formed, Quality that did not exist
> before.  Has Quality evolved in the last 5000 years?  I am seriously asking
> this because it does not fit with my current understanding, which may
> be erroneously Eastern (like the Tao) at this point..  I am rereading Lila
>  which may help me out.  My conception of harmony is the
> temporary coalescence of Quality.  This coalescence and dissipation is
> ongoing, an ebb and flow kind of thing, rather than growth.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Willblake2
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 10:25:30 AM, "Joseph Maurer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> From:   "Joseph Maurer" <[email protected]>
> Subject:    Re: [MD] Quality and Free Will
> Date:   March 28, 2009 10:25:30 AM PDT
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> On Friday 27 March 2009 10:36 PM Markhsmit writes:
>
> <snip>
>> Why does Quality trend towards harmony, or growth, or being in
>> phase? That is obvious. The intense love between between two
>> people is the sharing and harmonic growth of Quality. Quality loves
>> itself, it runs with the pack.
>
>> Is there anybody out there to harmonize with this post?
>
> Hi Markhsmit,
>
> The existence of quality also evolves to distinct levels. That makes
> harmony possible. Different levels of existence.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On 3/27/09 10:34 PM, "markhsmit" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Joe,
>>
>> That's exactly what I meant!  Nothing (left) to lose, not even Bobby..
>>
>> Quality (as expressed through free will) trends towards harmonics (for lack
>> of
>> a better word). This harmony has no human value associated with it, it can
>> be bad or good, beautiful or ugly. It attracts and connects,  reverberates
>> and
>> grows in a crowd.  It is the reason for the crowd, and then it subsides.
>>   Quality is like a wave, when it meets similar waves of itself, it is
>> additive (does not cancel) and Quality Grows. Take for example an orchestra
>> playing in the same key, the individual music is additive and intoxicating
>> for
>> the players and crowd (who add to the growth of the Quality).  Take for
>> example a group of people enjoying a hike, the Quality shared between is
>> additive, its much more fun to share.  Quality is additive in a football
>> stadium amongst the crowd, and is additive in a panic during a fire. Quality
>> seeks this harmony.  Harmonic Quality is present during a presidential
>> election, and on a battlefield to the death. Harmonic Quality is the reason
>> religions and philosophies grow.  It is the reason for communal greed
>> and possessiveness, for the shared fear of death.
>>
>> Quality is shared through the exchange of ideas, it can be considered
>> contagious except that it is not passed along, but is the source. Language
>> is
>> the vector for exchange.  Ever meditated with a group of monks?
>> It's incredible. That is the harmonic growth of Quality. It's how Quality >> trends. We know when we are in this group Quality, we feel swept away, part
>> of a larger thing.  We know exactly what it is.  We stick together and
>> consider our Quality to be better than those others, it is the way it works. >> We seek like-minded because of this tendency of Quality. Our free will, is
>> to grow that wave, or not.
>>
>> Quality is the reason mass is condensed energy; it is energy, (or atoms if
>> you
>> will) in harmony.  Quality is the reason the sun coalesces into a ball of
>> flame, and why the planets circle together continuously (resembling a wave, >> mathematically). It is the reason galaxies spiral. It is action shared, it
>> is in harmony, because that is its tendency.
>>
>> Quality arrises from nowhere. Where is the wave on a guitar string before it >> is plucked? the music? The same place Quality is. The string is struck and
>> sound comes forth, in the same way the wave of Quality appears out of
>> nowhere.
>> When guitar strings mix, you have music, if it fits together (like minded)
>> it
>> grows. Where are the waves on a still lake. They are there as potential..
>>  Where is the electron when it is not there?  It is there, it is simply a
>> flat
>> wave (straight line), but there.  Where am I when I'm not here?  It's the
>> same
>> thing.
>>
>> Why does Quality trend towards harmony, or growth, or being in phase? That
>> is
>> obvious.  The intense love between between two people is the sharing and
>> harmonic growth of Quality.  Quality loves itself, it runs with the pack..
>>
>> Is there anybody out there to harmonize with this post?
>>
>> Oh, well...
>>
>> Willblake2
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:22:21 PM, "Joseph Maurer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 26 March 2009 10:59 PM Markhsmit writes to all:
>>
>>> Free will, which is another name for Quality, provides us with the
>>> will to believe. We are free to believe in God, in Evolution, in
>>> Happiness.. We are free to believe that scientific positivism is
>>> the only reality, or one of many. Quality arrises in us through
>>> Intent. Sometimes this Intent makes it as far as
>>> our intellectual mind. We consider choices, and make them. Every
>>> choice shuts down the alternative (you can't gain something without
>>> losing something), but the choices thereafter are infinite. We take
>>> the left fork in the path of an ever forking road. That free will
>>> is Quality's expression. That free will began long before us.
>>> Sometimes we call it Chance, or Chaos, or the Divine, or Self
>>> Assembly, or a Selective Process. All Selective Processes are no
>>> different from our own. They are all free will.
>>
>>
>> Hi Markhsmit,
>>
>> A song to ponder:
>>
>> Busted flat in Baton Rouge waiting for a train,
>> Feeling just as faded as my Jeans!
>> Bobby thumbed a Diesel down just before it rained.
>> Took us all the way to New Orleans!
>>
>> I took my Harpoon out of my dirty red bandana,
>> And was playing soft while Bobby sang the Blues!
>> With those windshield wipers slapping time,
>> And Bobby¹s hand enclosed in mine,
>> We sang-up every song that driver knew
>>
>> Freedom¹s just another word for nothing left to lose!
>> Freedom ain¹t worth nothing! But it¹s free!
>> Feeling Good! Was easy, Lord! when Bobby sang the blues!
>> Brother that was good enough for me!
>> Good enough for me, and Bobby McGhee!
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> On 3/26/09 10:59 PM, "markhsmit" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Free will, which is another name for Quality, provides us with the will to >>> believe. We are free to believe in God, in Evolution, in Happiness.... We
>>> are
>>> free to believe that scientific positivism is the only reality, or one of
>>> many. Quality arrises in us through Intent. Sometimes this Intent makes it >>> as far as our intellectual mind. We consider choices, and make them. Every >>> choice shuts down the alternative (you can't gain something without losing >>> something), but the choices thereafter are infinite. We take the left fork
>>> in
>>> the path of an ever forking road. That free will is Quality's expression..
>>>  That free will began long before us.  Sometimes we call it Chance, or
>>> Chaos,
>>> or the Divine, or Self Assembly, or a Selective Process.  All Selective
>>> Processes are no different from our own.  They are all free will.
>>>
>>> Willblake2
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 19, 2009, at 9:30:14 PM, markhsmit <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> From: markhsmit <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [MD] Quality and Free Will
>>> Date: March 19, 2009 9:30:14 PM PDT
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Quality exists.  We break it down into subjective patterns to discuss it,
>>> little boxed systems. We interpret Quality through our senses, our dynamic >>> interplay with what is. It is this subjective patterning that is our true
>>> free will, we are free to interpret the way things seem.  In fact that is
>>> the
>>> only free will we have.  Whether we turn right or left, feel good or bad,
>>> makes no difference because we are still within our interpretation. However
>>> that interpretation can change on a dime.
>>>
>>> Why does that freedom of interpretation exist? Does it exist in everything.
>>>  Does it exist in Quality?  How much of it is free?  How much do we have
>>> rational control over?  How much does survival control our freedom?
>>>
>>> At the interface of what's outside us and within is constant communication.
>>>  That communication results in feelings (or emotions, passions).  Our
>>> intellectual brains are extensions of those feelings, nothing more, which
>>> break them up into a million parts.  When I change my mind or become
>>> temporarily enlightened, it's not because I have collected enough facts (how >>> many is enough?), it's because it feels right. Our free will comes from the >>> interface. It is neither within nor without, it is that dynamic interplay. >>> It is like music which comes from the interface of the speaker and the air, >>> or the interface of the air and our eardrums. Somewhere in between.. Free >>> will is no more our actions than the forces outside, it comes from somewhere >>> in between, and we feel it. It is that freewill that creates Quality. Free
>>> will is Quality.
>>>
>>> Willblake2
>>>
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>>
>>>
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to