Hi Marsha, > > >> Pirsig emphasizes > >>>> static patterns of value. Bo identifies the intellectual level > with > >>>> Subjects& Objects. But what if Subjects& Objects are seen as > >>>> static patterns of value? Doesn't this bridge the gap between the > 2 > >>>> metaphysics? > > > My answer to this quote would be NO! RMP's recognition sent him off to > the > mental institution. Having had such a realization, it's easy for him > to say!!! I > don't think making an intellectual switch from objects (thing-in- > itself) to > patterns (ever-changing, relational, unbounded, impermanent) does the > trick. > [Mary Replies] Agree with that! Changing one intellectual construction for another is to pay lip service. Doesn't change a thing.
Best, Mary Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
