dmb,

Not interested in having a discussion with you.  


Marsha   




On Sep 4, 2010, at 2:08 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> Marsha said to Mary:
> I wonder what this post is about.  It is my understanding that to take an 
> idea, like Radical Empiricism which is a hypothetical construct, and to state 
> that it is concretely demonstrable is a form of reification.  Do you think I 
> am wrong?
> 
> dmb says:
> 
> Are you wrong? Yes, hopelessly confused.
> 
> But more to the point, you should get your own thread going, one where words 
> can mean whatever you like.
> 
> 
> "Reification is a fallacy of ambiguity, when an abstraction is treated as if 
> it were a concrete, real event, or physical entity. In other words, it is the 
> error of treating as a "real thing" something which is not a real thing, but 
> merely an idea. ...Etymology: From Latin res thing + facere to make, 
> reification can be 'translated' as thing-making; the turning of something 
> abstract into a concrete thing or object".
> 
> If radical empiricism were being reified it would be presented and treated as 
> a thing rather than an idea. As far as I know, nobody has ever treated it as 
> a thing, an event or a physical entity. Do you know of any such treatment? Of 
> course not. Radical empiricism is a very powerful antidote to the 
> reifications that haunt philosophy, particularly the Cartesian dualism known 
> as SOM. 
> 
> 
> "Nothingness. Another fallaciously reifying use of "nothing" is found in this 
> joke: A man walks into a bar. The bartender asks him what he wants. 
> "Nothing," he says. "So why did you come in here?" "Because nothing is better 
> than a cold drink." The fallacy is manifested in the listener's 
> interpretation of the man's answer, as, if the joke were successful, the 
> listener is led to conflate the semantics of the two distinct but 
> interrelated notions of emptiness and nothingness. If interpreted without 
> this natural equivocation, the man's answer literally — if awkwardly, in the 
> context of answering the question — means that he would prefer to drink 
> nothing than to have a cold drink, instead of the commonly understood 
> meaning, "Cold drinks are better than everything"." 
> 
> 
> Nothing is better than discussing philosophical ideas with you because your 
> view makes everything look better. 
> 
> 
> "essentialism |iˈsen sh əˌlizəm| noun Philosophy.  a belief that things have 
> a set of characteristics that make them what they are, and that the task of 
> science and philosophy is their discovery and expression; the doctrine that 
> essence is prior to existence."
> 
> 
> "nothingness |ˈnəθi ng nis| noun. the absence or cessation of life or 
> existence : the fear of the total nothingness of death.• worthlessness; 
> insignificance; unimportance : the nothingness of it all overwhelmed him."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                         
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to