On Sep 18, 2010, at 8:39 PM, X Acto wrote: > > > > Marsha asks: > How are feelings, passions and other modes of consciousness included back > into > rationality? How are they included back into science? How are then included > back into mathematics? How? > > > Ron: > By understanding truth to be an intellectual value. Often those equations > that > explain phenomena best > are the most beautiful, they are chosen for their aesthetic as well as > functionality in explanation to make > them what we mean when we say they are the best explanations. > > that can mean 2+2 may equal 5 if the value of 2 is high enough. >
Marsha: >From my point-of-view there is an emerging level where value is known as >primary, and fourth-level, intellectual patterns as tools are used for creating and implementing a higher quality experience/environment. Where one "can then examine intellectual realities the same way one examines paintings in an art gallery, not with an effort to find out which one is the 'real' painting, but simply to enjoy and keep those that are of value. There are many sets of intellectual reality in existence and we can perceive some to have more quality than others, but that we do so is, in part, the result of our history and current patterns of values." This works for me; it doesn't work for you that is okay by me. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
