That data makes me sooooo angry!!!
On Sep 20, 2010, at 4:02 PM, MarshaV wrote: > > > You changed the question.... You were putting feelings and passion into > rationality. You wrote FEELINGS and PASSION. You are sooooo > boring...... > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2010, at 3:30 PM, MarshaV wrote: > >> >> On Sep 18, 2010, at 3:13 PM, david buchanan wrote: >> >>> >>> Marsha's definition: >>> Within the MoQ, fourth level, the Intellectual Level, is comprised of >>> intellectual static patterns of value. The way that these patterns function >>> is as reified concepts and the rules for their rational analysis and >>> manipulation. Reification decontextualizes. Intellectual patterns process >>> from a subject/object conceptual framework creating false boundaries that >>> give the illusion of independence as a “thing” or an “object of analysis.” >>> The fourth level is a formalized subject/object level (SOM), where the >>> paramount demand is for rational, objective knowledge, which is free from >>> the taint of any subjectivity. >>> >>> >>> dmb's alternative: >>> >>> According to the MOQ, the intellectual level includes all intellectual >>> static patterns and all intellectual thought styles, such as classical and >>> romantic for example. These patterns are derived from experience and their >>> veracity depends on their ability to function in experience. The MOQ's >>> reconceptualization of the intellect is predicated on a rejection of >>> subject-object metaphysics, the conceptual framework that reifies subjects >>> and objects. (The MOQ says subjects and objects are concepts, not >>> entities.) Unlike SOM, where the paramount demand is for objectivity and >>> disinterested observation, the MOQ's fourth level gives us an expanded form >>> of rationality that includes feelings, passions, alternate modes of >>> consciousness and all the other categories of experience formerly dismissed >>> as "merely" subjective. >> >> >> Marsha asks: >> How are feelings, passions and other modes of consciousness included back >> into rationality? How are they included back into science? How are then >> included back into mathematics? How? > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
