nobody knows!

2010/9/28 MarshaV <[email protected]>

>
> And what is gravity?
>
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2010, at 1:28 PM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:
>
> > Voices are whispering in the background scenery of science,
> Marsha,...maybe
> > the spin is the parent of gravity.
> > Rumours!
> >
> > 2010/9/28 MarshaV <[email protected]>
> >
> >>
> >> Ian,
> >>
> >> Wouldn't it be fun to be a fly on the wall at that conference!
> >>
> >> The book is interesting.  It's an introduction and survey, and at this
> >> point perfect for my amateur understanding.  I've gone through four
> >> lecture series on various aspects of quantum science (for
> non-scientists),
> >> and this is the first presentation of the quantum enigma, and in a clear
> >> voice.  It's thrilling.  I would listen to the professor lecturing and
> want
> >> to
> >> throw things at them, because they spoke as if their words were fact
> >> beyond question.  This book was a pleasant relief from scientific
> >> materialism:  "Spin is not just mathematical equations, it's real!"
> >>
> >> Good book!
> >>
> >>
> >> Marsha
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sep 28, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Marsha,
> >>>
> >>> An interesting sounding book. I see Dave and others have pointed you
> >>> to the many "Mary the Colour Scientist" / Qualia references.
> >>>
> >>> You should also note that Chalmers was previously a star part of the
> >>> Arizona "Science of Consciousness" brigade - with Hofstader and
> >>> Hameroff and others - the wedding of quantum science with neuroscience
> >>> and philosophy has been pretty much their whole agenda for 15 years
> >>> (since almost exactly the same moment Pirsig was involved in the
> >>> Einstein meets Magritte conference.) I notice also that Buddhism is on
> >>> the agenda for their next conference. What goes around comes around.
> >>>
> >>> Ian
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:09 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Dave,
> >>>>
> >>>> Maybe when quantum philosophy weds Neurophilosophy?  What kind of
> >>>> circumstances will cause that divine marriage?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Marsha
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> p.s. For those fans of Noam Chomsky.  He's being interviewed today on
> >> the
> >>>> PRI program 'On Point."
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sep 28, 2010, at 11:31 AM, David Thomas wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 9/28/10 9:48 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> If you had a point to make other than to show me how much I do not
> >> know,
> >>>>>> please explain it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was only pointing to other takes on the "Mary" thought experiment
> >> that
> >>>>> might clear up (or add) to your puzzlement.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I do think though that attempts by science and philosophy to
> >> simultaneously
> >>>>> solve the "hard problems" of "Quantum Enigma" and "Consciousness
> >> Enigma" are
> >>>>> doomed to fail philosophically until the science in both fields
> >> advances. I
> >>>>> also think part of the reason behind the claim that "philosophy is
> >> dead" is
> >>>>> that the specialized areas of science are so varied and technically
> >>>>> difficult in the domains of the "hard problems" that no individual
> >>>>> philosopher, short of a savant, can acquire the detailed depth of
> >>>>> understanding necessary in each of the scientific fields required to
> be
> >> able
> >>>>> to integrate their advances into a coherent whole. It will have to be
> a
> >>>>> combined effort.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dave
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >>>>> Archives:
> >>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ___
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >>>> Archives:
> >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >>>>
> >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >>> Archives:
> >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >>
> >>
> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >> Archives:
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > parser
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to