I've mostly thought of you as someone wise enough to consider the excluded middle. :-)
On Mar 23, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > Who me ? ;-) > Ian > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks, your wording is plain enough, and of course I agree, but I do worry >> sometimes, though, about the tyrannical German male who writes Orwellian >> posts detailing someone's else's thought crimes. >> >> >> >> On Mar 23, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >> >>> Marsha, >>> >>> Stuff that people typically call "common sense" is in fact culturally >>> conditioned (static) socio-intellectual patterns - reflected in the >>> SOM language we use to refer to them. Common sense is wrong. Reality >>> is the quality that precedes those patterns - but everyday language >>> based on common sense doesn't reflect this. >>> >>> Any more and I just refer you back to Arlo's wording. >>> Ian >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:59 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Ian, >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 23, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree with all of that Arlo. >>>>> >>>>> Your 5 line summary of the MoQ is as good a plain English statement as >>>>> I've heard. >>>>> >>>>> Your conclusion is important ... far from being esoteric or >>>>> obscurantist, the fact that MoQish expressions may "problematize" >>>>> established common sense expressions is indeed the point. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> It is commonsense as she is known that is wrong. >>>> >>>> >>>> I cannot understand the this sentence. >>>> >>>> >>>> Marsha >>>> >>> ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
