Craig, I thought I made this point a while back, but I guess it bears repeating...
> > > [Craig] > DQ cannot be free will, because Pirsig's example of DQ (jumping off a hot > stove) is INvoluntary. > It depends on the circumstances. The predefined sq ALWAYS defines the possible responses to hot-stove sitting, and sometimes its even best to stay on a hot stove on purpose. So I sure don't look at sitting on one as necessarily, "involuntary". > Nor is DQ evolution, because it is SQ that exhibits evolution from level to > level. > How 'bout, DQ is the evolutionary drive, and SQ the evolutionary results? That makes sense all ways around, doesn't it? John, Just now catching up on his back reading. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
