On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:05 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > Dan responded to Steve: > > [Dan] You (Steve) said: The question of free will versus determinism > gets replaced > by the question, to what extent do we follow DQ and to what extent do > we follow sq? > > [Dan] It appears from reading this that these are two mutually exclusive > options, hence my observation that they are not. > > Huh, Dan ? "to what extent" A and/or B suggests the exact opposite of > mutual exclusivity. It correctly implies you generally have a mix of > both side by side. > > I don't in fact agree with Steve's underlying analogy between DQ/sq > and Free-Will / Determinism, or DMB's suggestion that causation is > part of one but not the other, .... causation is just weird and > conventional linguistically .... I'm just pointing out the flaws in > the style of argumentation that is happening - in the church of > reason, as has been pointed out. > > Ian > PS What's so funny 'bout peace, love and understanding ? >
Ian, Do you think Steve is replacing the issues, or just stating that its a better question to be asking since the free-will vs. determinism platypus has been removed? Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
