On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Ian Glendinning <[email protected]> wrote: > Not sure > > I agree Free-Will vs Determinism is a Pirsigian platypus, when looking > to make objective definitions and distinctions - the point of calling > it a platypus, (which has been thoroughly resolved by evolutionary > philosophers).
Steve: How have evolutionary philosophers the than RMP resolved this platypus? Ian: > And, the DQ/sq distinction is fundamental to MoQ. > > Not sure one question replaces the other analogously or otherwise. Steve: I'm not trying to offer any radical idea about whether this question replaces the SOM question. I'm just referring to what RMP does here in response to the SOM question of free will/determinism: > "To the extent that one's behavior is > controlled by static patterns of quality it is without choice. But to the > extent > that one follows Dynamic Quality, which is undefinable, one's behavior is > free." > (LILA, Chapter 12) Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
