Oh and by the way, well done again for turning the subject immediately away from the point I did make. Ian
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, MarshaV <val...@att.net> wrote: > > On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:05 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > >> Dan responded to Steve: >> >> [Dan] You (Steve) said: The question of free will versus determinism >> gets replaced >> by the question, to what extent do we follow DQ and to what extent do >> we follow sq? >> >> [Dan] It appears from reading this that these are two mutually exclusive >> options, hence my observation that they are not. >> >> Huh, Dan ? "to what extent" A and/or B suggests the exact opposite of >> mutual exclusivity. It correctly implies you generally have a mix of >> both side by side. >> >> I don't in fact agree with Steve's underlying analogy between DQ/sq >> and Free-Will / Determinism, or DMB's suggestion that causation is >> part of one but not the other, .... causation is just weird and >> conventional linguistically .... I'm just pointing out the flaws in >> the style of argumentation that is happening - in the church of >> reason, as has been pointed out. >> >> Ian >> PS What's so funny 'bout peace, love and understanding ? >> > > > Ian, > > Do you think Steve is replacing the issues, or just stating that its a better > question to be asking since the free-will vs. determinism platypus has > been removed? > > Marsha > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
